Developmental changes in large-scale network connectivity in autism
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Disrupted cortical connectivity is thought to underlie the complex cognitive and behavior profile observed in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Previous neuroimaging research has identified patterns of both functional hypo- and hyper-connectivity in individuals with ASD. A recent theory attempting to reconcile conflicting results in the literature proposes that hyper-connectivity of brain networks may be more characteristic of young children with ASD, while hypo-connectivity may be more prevalent in adolescents and adults with the disorder when compared to typical development (TD) (Uddin etal., 2013). Previous work has examined only young children, mixed groups of children and adolescents, or adult cohorts in separate studies, leaving open the question of developmental influences on functional brain connectivity in ASD. METHODS: The current study tests this developmental hypothesis by examining within- and between-network resting state functional connectivity in a large sample of 26 children, 28 adolescents, and 18 adults with ASD and age- and IQ-matchedTD individuals for the first time using an entirely data-driven approach. Independent component analyses (ICA) and dual regression was applied to data from three age cohorts to examine the effects of participant age on patterns of within-networkwhole-brain functional connectivity in individuals with ASD compared with TD individuals. Between-network connectivity differences were examined for each age cohort by comparing correlations between ICA components across groups. RESULTS: We find that in the youngest cohort (age 11 and under), children with ASD exhibit hyper-connectivity within large-scale brain networks as well as decreased between-network connectivity compared with age-matchedTD children. In contrast, adolescents with ASD (age 11-18) do not differ from TD adolescents in within-network connectivity, yet show decreased between-network connectivity compared with TD adolescents. Adults with ASD show no within- or between-network differences in functional network connectivity compared with neurotypical age-matched individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Characterizing within- and between-network functional connectivity in age-stratified cohorts of individuals with ASD and TD individuals demonstrates that functional connectivity atypicalities in the disorder are not uniform across the lifespan. These results demonstrate how explicitly characterizing participant age and adopting a developmental perspective can lead to a more nuanced understanding of atypicalities of functional brain connectivity in autism.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There have been reports of both within-network hyperconnectivity and hypoconnectivity of the FPN and DMN in ASD.
“For example, there have been reports of both within-network hyperconnectivity (Uddin et al., 2013; Nomi and Uddin, 2015) and hypoconnectivity of the FPN (Bos et al., 2014) and DMN (Bos et al., 2014; Washington et al., 2014).”
From Investigating functional brain network integrity using a traditional and novel categorical scheme for neurodevelopmental disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Nomi and Uddin, 2015
Significance was determined using a threshold-free cluster enhancement of p < .05 (FWE-corrected) for both within- and between-network analyses.
“Significance was determined using a threshold-free cluster enhancement of p < .05 (FWE-corrected) for both within- and between-network analyses, as in previous studies (Uddin et al., 2013; Nomi and Uddin, 2015).”
From Investigating functional brain network integrity using a traditional and novel categorical scheme for neurodevelopmental disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Nomi and Uddin, 2015
Past studies using ICA dual regression to compare children with ASD or ADHD to TD children used small sample sizes (n = 20-26 per group).
“Past studies using ICA dual regression to compare children with ASD or ADHD to TD children used small sample sizes (n = 20–26 per group) (Uddin et al., 2013; Yoo et al., 2017; Nomi and Uddin, 2015; Washington et al., 2014; Choi et al., 2013).”
From Investigating functional brain network integrity using a traditional and novel categorical scheme for neurodevelopmental disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Nomi and Uddin, 2015
The ASD literature is similarly inconsistent, even when limited to studies using dual regression ICA.
“The ASD literature is similarly inconsistent, even when limited to studies using dual regression ICA.”
From Investigating functional brain network integrity using a traditional and novel categorical scheme for neurodevelopmental disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Nomi and Uddin, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 274
- Authors
- Nomi, J. S., & Uddin, L. Q.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Uddin, Lucina Q.
- Venue
- NeuroImage: Clinical
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 732-741
- ISSN
- 2213-1582 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4375789
- OpenAlex
- W2043875710
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 19.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage Clinical (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH092288)
- NARSAD Young Investigator Award
- Slifka/Ritvo Innovation in Autism Research Award
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, brain functional connectivity, large-scale brain networks, developmental changes, hyperconnectivity, between-network connectivity, within-network connectivity, children, adolescents and adults, resting-state functional connectivity
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Child, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review