Prediction of fast decline in amyloid positive mild cognitive impairment patients using multimodal biomarkers
Open accessAbstract
It may be possible to classify patients with Aβ positive (+) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) into fast and slow decliners according to their biomarker status. In this study, we aimed to develop a risk prediction model to predict fast decline in the Aβ+ MCI population using multimodal biomarkers. We included 186 Aβ+ MCI patients who underwent florbetapir PET, brain MRI, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analyses, and FDG PET at baseline. We defined conversion to dementia within 3 years (= fast decline) as the outcome. The associations of potential covariates (MCI stage, APOE4 genotype, corrected hippocampal volume (HV), FDG PET SUVR, AV45 PET SUVR, CSF Aβ, total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau)) with the outcome were tested and nomograms were constructed using logistic regression models in the training dataset (n=124, n of fast decliners=52). The model was internally validated with the testing dataset (n=62, n of fast decliners=22). The multivariable analysis (including CSF t-tau) showed that MCI stage (late MCI vs. early MCI; OR 15.88, 95% CI 4.59, 54.88), APOE4 (OR 5.65, 95% CI 1.52, 20.98), corrected HV*1000 (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09, 0.57), FDG SUVR*10 (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27, 0.71), and loge CSF t-tau (OR 6.20, 95% CI 1.48, 25.96) were associated with being fast decliners. In the second model including CSF p-tau instead of t-tau, the above associations remained the same, with a significant association between loge CSF p-tau (OR 4.53, 95% CI 1.26, 16.31) and fast decline. The constructed nomograms showed excellent predictive performance (90%) on validation with the testing dataset. Among Aβ+ MCI patients, our findings suggested that multimodal AD biomarkers are significantly associated with being classified as fast decliners. A nomogram incorporating these biomarkers might be useful in early treatment decisions or stratified enrollment of this population into clinical trials.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prognostic value of a diagnosis based on biomarkers remains limited, first because there is high variability of decline rate among individuals with biomarker-positive Alzheimer's disease, and second because non-Alzheimer's disease neurodegenerative diseases contribute to cognitive decline.
“As underscored by the Cochrane reviews, the prognostic value of a diagnosis based on biomarkers remains limited, first because there is a high variability of decline rate among individuals with biomarker-positive Alzheimer’s disease,79 and second because non-Alzheimer’s disease neurodegenerative diseases contribute to cognitive decline.”
From Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations of the International Working Group (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 46
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Landau S.M. Harvey D. Madison C.M. Koeppe R.A. Reiman E.M. Foster N.L. Weiner M.W. Jagust W.J. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI Neurobiol. Aging 32 2011 1207 1218 19660834 PMC2891865
- Authors
- Jang, H., Park, J., Woo, S., Kim, S., Kim, H. J., Na, D. L., Lockhart, S. N., Kim, Y., Kim, K. W., Cho, S. H., Kim, S. J., Seong, J.-K., & Seo, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Samsung Medical Center (KR)
- Korea University (KR)
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- Kangwon National University (KR)
- Jeonbuk National University Hospital (KR)
- Chonnam National University (KR)
- Samsung (South Korea) (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Seong, Joon-Kyung
- Seo, Sang Won
- ORCID
- Venue
- NeuroImage Clinical
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 101941
- ISSN
- 2213-1582 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6677900
- OpenAlex
- W2962887116
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage Clinical (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministry of Health and Welfare (HI18C1629)
- Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018-ER6203-01, 2017M3C7A1048092)
- Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2018M3C7A1056512)
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2017R1A2B2005081, 2016M3C7A1913844)
- Society of Wetland Scientists
- Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- mild cognitive impairment, amyloid-positive, conversion to dementia, Alzheimer's disease, multimodal biomarkers, risk prediction model, nomogram, CSF tau, phosphorylated tau, APOE ε4, hippocampal volume, FDG-PET, florbetapir PET, amyloid imaging, cognitive decline prediction
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Disease Progression, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review