Integrated memory for objects, places, and temporal order: Evidence for episodic-like memory in mice
Abstract
Human episodic memory refers to the recollection of an unique past experience in terms of what happened, and where and when it happened. Factoring out the issue of conscious recollection, episodic memory, even at the behavioral level, has been difficult to demonstrate in non-human mammals. Although, it was previously shown that rodents can associate what and when or what and where information given on unique trials, it proved to be difficult to demonstrate memory for what, where, and when simultaneously in mammals, without using extensive training procedures, which might induce semantic rather than episodic memory recall. Towards the goal of an animal model of human episodic memory we designed an three-trial object exploration task in which different versions of the novelty-preference paradigm were combined to subsume (a) object recognition memory, (b) the memory for locations in which objects were explored, and (c) the temporal order memory for object presented at distinct time points. We found that mice spent more time exploring two "old familiar" objects relative to two "recent familiar" objects, reflecting memory for what and when and concomitantly directed more exploration at a spatially displaced "old familiar" object relative to a stationary "old familiar" object, reflecting memory for what and where. These results suggest that during a single test trial the mice were able to (a) recognize previously explored objects, (b) remember the location in which particular objects were previously encountered, and (c) to discriminate the relative recency in which different objects were presented. According to the currently discussed behavioral criteria for episodic-like memory in animals, our results suggest that mice are capable to form such higher order memories.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The trial-unique learning paradigm has been successfully implemented in rodents and birds.
“The trial-unique learning paradigm has been successfully implemented in rodents (rats: Kart-Teke et al. 2006; mice: Dere et al. 2005) and birds (Zentall et al. 2001).”
From Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes (2010) · cites this paper as Dere et al. 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 243
- Authors
- Dere, E., Huston, J. P., & De Souza Silva, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Huston, Joseph P.
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 214-221
- ISSN
- 1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094136039
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- episodic-like memory, mice, object recognition memory, spatial memory, temporal order memory, novelty preference, recollection
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Space Perception, Recognition, Psychology, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review