Cited by 43Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Hippocampal α5 subunit-containing GABAA receptors are involved in the development of the latent inhibition effect

Gerdjikov, T.V., Rudolph, U., Keist, R., Möhler, H., Feldon, J., Yee, B.K.·2008·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Hippocampal GABA(A) receptors containing the alpha 5 subunit have been implicated in the modulation of hippocampal-dependent learning, presumably via their tonic inhibitory influence on hippocampal glutamatergic activity. Here, we examined the expression of latent inhibition (LI)--a form of selective learning that is sensitive to a number of manipulations targeted at the hippocampal formation, in alpha 5(H105R) mutant mice with reduced levels of hippocampal alpha 5-containing GABA(A) receptors. A single pre-exposure to the taste conditioned stimulus (CS) prior to the pairing of the same CS with LiCl-induced nausea was effective in reducing the conditioned aversion against the taste CS in wild-type mice--thus constituting the LI effect. LI was however distinctly absent in male alpha 5(H105R) mutant mice. Hence, a partial loss of hippocampal alpha 5 GABA(A) receptors is sufficient to alter one major form of selective learning, albeit this was not seen in the female. This observed phenotype suggests that specific activation of these extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors may confer therapeutic potential against the failure to show selectivity in learning by human psychotic patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.06.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence supporting a critical role for α5GABAARs in certain memory processes.

    “However, there is also some evidence supporting a critical role for α5GABAARs in certain memory processes [78, 59].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [78]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 43

Authors
Gerdjikov, T. V., Rudolph, U., Keist, R., Möhler, H., Feldon, J., & Yee, B. K.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Yee, B.K.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
87-94
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053290774
Cited by
43
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
extrasynaptic GABA receptors, latent inhibition, conditioned taste aversion, sex differences, selective learning, tonic inhibition, glutamatergic activity, psychosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Conditioning, Classical, Drinking Behavior, Female, Hippocampus, Learning, Male, Mice, Mutant Strains, Neural Inhibition, Phenotype, Receptors, GABA-A, Water, Point Mutation, Glutamic Acid, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review