Cited by 84Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Intra-amygdala anxiogenic drug infusion prior to retrieval biases rats towards the use of habit memory.

Elliott, Audrea E., Packard, Mark G.·2008·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

In a dual-solution plus-maze task that can be acquired using either hippocampus-dependent "cognitive/place" learning or dorsal striatal-dependent "habit/response" learning, pre-acquisition peripheral or intra-basolateral amygdala (BLA) injections of anxiogenic drugs result in the predominant use of response learning. The present experiments examined the effect of anxiogenic drug treatment on the relative use of multiple memory systems when administered prior to memory retrieval. Adult male Long-Evans rats were trained for two days (6 trials/day, 30s ITI) in a dual-solution plus-maze task to swim from the same start point (south) to an escape platform that was located in a consistent goal arm (west). On day three, prior to a memory retrieval probe trial from a novel start point (north), rats received a peripheral (0.03, 0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg), or intra-BLA (0.1 microg/0.5 microl) injection of the anxiogenic alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor antagonist RS 79948-197, or saline. Relative to saline controls, rats receiving either peripheral or intra-BLA infusions of RS 79948-197 predominantly displayed response learning on the probe trial. In an additional experiment peripheral (0.1 mg/kg) or intra-BLA (0.1 microg) drug injections administered prior to both acquisition and retrieval also resulted in the predominant use of response learning. The findings indicate that (1) similar to acquisition, peripheral injection of an anxiogenic drug prior to memory retrieval biases rats towards the use of habit/response memory, (2) intra-BLA infusions of an anxiogenic drug is sufficient to produce this modulatory effect of emotional state on memory retrieval, and (3) state-dependency does not appear to play a role in the effects of anxiogenic drug treatment on multiple memory system use. The findings may have implications for understanding the interaction between brain function, emotion, and the relative use of multiple memory systems in human psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.06.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The types of tasks impaired by stress are those requiring prefrontal cortex operations, whereas engrained habits relying on basal ganglia circuits are spared or enhanced.

    “We now understand that the types of tasks that were impaired by stress were those that required PFC operations13, whereas engrained habits that rely on basal ganglia circuits were spared or enhanced14.”
  • More severe acute stressors impair hippocampal functions but continue to strengthen emotional associations and motor habits carried out by the amygdala and striatum.

    “More severe acute stressors impair hippocampal functions38 but continue to strengthen the emotional associations and motor habits carried out by the amygdala and striatum, respectively14,39.”
  • Tasks that rely on the habitual functions of basal ganglia circuits or the emotional conditioning of the amygdala are spared or even enhanced by stress exposure.

    “Later research in animals demonstrated that exposure to acute, uncontrollable stress impairs the working memory abilities of the PFC19,20, while tasks that rely on the habitual functions of basal ganglia circuits, for example20,21, or the emotional conditioning of the amygdala22 are spared or even enhanced by stress exposure (Fig. 1b).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 84

Authors
Elliott, A. E., & Packard, M. G.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Packard, Mark G.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
616-623
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994181427
Cited by
84
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
anxiogenic drugs, basolateral amygdala, memory retrieval, habit learning, response learning, hippocampal-dependent memory, state dependence
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Infusions, Intravenous, Isoquinolines, Learning, Male, Memory, Naphthyridines, Pentobarbital, Swimming, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2, Anesthetics, General, Maze Learning, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review