Cited by 95Memory and Neural MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMemory Processes and Influences

Failures to reconsolidate memory in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Ohno, Masuo·2009·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that the formation of spatial, contextual and trace conditioning memories are impaired in animal models of Alzheimer's disease (AD), consistent with the observations that the first sign of cognitive decline in AD includes difficulties in the acquisition of new information or memory formation. Evidence is accumulating that memory retrieval is a dynamic process in which stored information becomes labile again and needs to be restabilized. However, it is poorly understood how this process referred to as memory reconsolidation is affected in animal models of AD. The present study was designed to use contextual fear conditioning to compare the changes in memory formation and subsequent reconsolidation processes in transgenic mice that overexpress human APP and PS1 harboring five familial AD mutations (5XFAD model). The results clearly demonstrate that cognitive dysfunction starts to occur primarily as reduced levels of contextual learning or memory formation in 5XFAD mice, but it is exacerbated by additional retrieval-dependent retrograde amnesia due to deficient reconsolidation as disease further develops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.05.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 95

Authors
Ohno, M.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Ohno, Masuo
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
455-459
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972805775
Cited by
95
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH067251)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
memory reconsolidation, Alzheimer's disease, 5xFAD mice, contextual fear conditioning, memory retrieval, retrograde amnesia, APP overexpression, familial Alzheimer's disease mutations, contextual learning, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Conditioning, Classical, Disease Models, Animal, Fear, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Memory Disorders, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Receptors, Cell Surface, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Mice, Presenilin-1, Protease Nexins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review