Cited by 30Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

The synergy of working memory and inhibitory control: Behavioral, pharmacological and neural functional evidences

Grégoire, Stéphanie, Rivalan, Marion, Le Moine, Catherine, Dellu-Hagedorn, Françoise·2012·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Concomitant deficits in working memory and behavioral inhibition in several psychiatric disorders like attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, addiction or mania, suggest that common brain mechanisms may underlie their etiologies. Based on the theoretical assumption that a continuum exists between health and mental disorders, we explored the relationship between working memory and inhibition in healthy individuals, through spontaneous inter individual differences in behavior, and tested the hypothesis of a functional link through the fronto-striatal dopaminergic system. Rats were classified into three groups, showing good, intermediate and poor working memory and were compared for their inhibitory abilities. These two functions were simultaneously modulated by a dose-effect of d-amphetamine and in situ hybridization was used to quantify dopaminergic receptor (RD1) mRNAs in prefrontal cortex and striatal areas. A functional relationship between working memory and inhibition abilities was revealed. Both functions were similarly modulated by d-amphetamine according to an inverted-U shaped relationship and depending on initial individual performances. D-amphetamine selectively improved working memory and inhibition of poor and intermediate performers at low doses whereas it impaired both processes in good performers at a higher dose. D1 receptors were less expressed in prelimbic, infralimbic and anterior cingulate cortices of good compared to intermediate and poor performers, w…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.12.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 30

Authors
Grégoire, S., Rivalan, M., Le Moine, C., & Dellu-Hagedorn, F.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Dellu-Hagedorn, Françoise
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
97
Issue
2
Pages
202-212
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067029687
Cited by
30
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
working memory, behavioral inhibition, inhibitory control, dopamine D1 receptor, d-amphetamine, individual differences, prefrontal cortex, striatum, endophenotypes, dimensional approach, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, addiction, mania
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Corpus Striatum, Dextroamphetamine, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Pathways, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review