The synergy of working memory and inhibitory control: Behavioral, pharmacological and neural functional evidences
Abstract
Concomitant deficits in working memory and behavioral inhibition in several psychiatric disorders like attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, addiction or mania, suggest that common brain mechanisms may underlie their etiologies. Based on the theoretical assumption that a continuum exists between health and mental disorders, we explored the relationship between working memory and inhibition in healthy individuals, through spontaneous inter individual differences in behavior, and tested the hypothesis of a functional link through the fronto-striatal dopaminergic system. Rats were classified into three groups, showing good, intermediate and poor working memory and were compared for their inhibitory abilities. These two functions were simultaneously modulated by a dose-effect of d-amphetamine and in situ hybridization was used to quantify dopaminergic receptor (RD1) mRNAs in prefrontal cortex and striatal areas. A functional relationship between working memory and inhibition abilities was revealed. Both functions were similarly modulated by d-amphetamine according to an inverted-U shaped relationship and depending on initial individual performances. D-amphetamine selectively improved working memory and inhibition of poor and intermediate performers at low doses whereas it impaired both processes in good performers at a higher dose. D1 receptors were less expressed in prelimbic, infralimbic and anterior cingulate cortices of good compared to intermediate and poor performers, w…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
D-amphetamine selectively improved working memory in poor and intermediate performers at low doses, whereas it impaired good performers at a higher dose.
“D-amphetamine selectively improved working memory in poor and intermediate performers at low doses, whereas it was impaired good performers at a higher dose (14, 45).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Grégoire, S., Rivalan, M., Le Moine, C., & Dellu-Hagedorn, F.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Dellu-Hagedorn, Françoise
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-212
- ISSN
- 1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067029687
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- working memory, behavioral inhibition, inhibitory control, dopamine D1 receptor, d-amphetamine, individual differences, prefrontal cortex, striatum, endophenotypes, dimensional approach, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, addiction, mania
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Corpus Striatum, Dextroamphetamine, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neural Pathways, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Maze Learning, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review