Roles of nucleus accumbens and basolateral amygdala in autoshaped lever pressing
Open accessAbstract
Initially-neutral cues paired with rewards are thought to acquire motivational significance, as if the incentive motivational value of the reward is transferred to the cue. Such cues may serve as secondary reinforcers to establish new learning, modulate the performance of instrumental action (Pavlovian-instrumental transfer, PIT), and be the targets of approach and other cue-directed behaviors. Here we examined the effects of lesions of the ventral striatal nucleus accumbens (ACb) and the basolateral amygdala (BLA) on the acquisition of discriminative autoshaped lever-pressing in rats. Insertion of one lever into the experimental chamber was reinforced by sucrose delivery, but insertion of another lever was not reinforced. Although sucrose was delivered independently of the rats' behavior, sham-lesioned rats rapidly came to press the reinforced but not the nonreinforced lever. Bilateral ACb lesions impaired the initial acquisition of sign-tracking but not its terminal levels. In contrast, BLA lesions produced substantial deficits in terminal levels of sign-tracking. Furthermore, whereas ACb lesions primarily affected the probability of lever press responses, BLA lesions mostly affected the rate of responding once it occurred. Finally, disconnection lesions that disrupted communication between ACb and BLA produced both sets of deficits. We suggest that ACb is important for initial acquisition of consummatory-like responses that incorporate hedonic aspects of the reward, while BLA serves to enhance such incentive salience once it is acquired.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disconnecting basolateral amygdala and ventral striatum impairs autoshaping and second order conditioning.
“impairs both autoshaping (Chang et al., 2012) and second order conditioning (Setlow et al., 2002)”
From A framework for understanding the emerging role of corticolimbic-ventral striatal networks in OCD-associated repetitive behaviors (2015) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2012
The amygdala plays an integral role in encoding salience and maintains conditioned effects after repeated pairing of internal drug sensations with external environmental stimuli.
“The amygdala in particular plays an integral role in encoding salience, and also maintains conditioned effects after repeated pairing of internal drug sensations with external environmental stimuli (Chang et al., 2012, Meil and See, 1997, Szalay et al., 2013).”
From Sensitive periods of substance abuse: Early risk for the transition to dependence (2017) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2012
The BLA is necessary for maintaining salience encoding over time.
“the BLA appears necessary for maintaining salience encoding over time (Chang et al., 2012, Szalay et al., 2013).”
From Sensitive periods of substance abuse: Early risk for the transition to dependence (2017) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2012
The NAc is important in encoding the initial salience of the primary reward-related cue.
“the importance of the NAc in encoding the initial salience of the primary reward-related cue”
From Sensitive periods of substance abuse: Early risk for the transition to dependence (2017) · cites this paper as Chang et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Chang, S. E., Wheeler, D. S., & Holland, P. C.
- Corresponding author
- Holland, Peter C.
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 441-451
- ISSN
- 1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3358568
- OpenAlex
- W2158917576
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH053667, MH53667, R37MH053667)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- nucleus accumbens, basolateral amygdala, sign-tracking, Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer, incentive salience, secondary reinforcement, reward learning, ventral striatum, sucrose reward, approach behavior
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Association Learning, Cues, Male, Motivation, Nucleus Accumbens, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review