Sexual experience enhances cognitive flexibility and dendritic spine density in the medial prefrontal cortex
Abstract
The medial prefrontal cortex is important for cognitive flexibility, a capability that is affected by environmental conditions and specific experiences. Aversive experience, such as chronic restraint stress, is known to impair performance on a task of cognitive flexibility, specifically attentional set-shifting, in rats. Concomitant with this performance decrement, chronic stress reduces the number of dendritic spines on pyramidal neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex. No previous studies have examined whether a rewarding experience, namely mating, affects cognitive flexibility and dendritic spines in the medial prefrontal cortex of male rats. To test this possibility, we exposed adult male rats to sexual receptive females once daily for one week, assessed attentional set-shifting performance, and then analyzed their brains for changes in dendritic spines. We found that sexual experience improved performance on extradimensional set-shifting, which is known to require the medial prefrontal cortex. Additionally, we observed increased dendritic spine density on apical and basal dendrites of pyramidal neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex, but not the orbitofrontal cortex, after sexual experience. We also found that sexual experience enhanced dendritic spine density on granule neurons of the dentate gyrus. The ventral hippocampus sends a direct projection to the medial prefrontal cortex, raising the possibility that experience-dependent changes in the hippocampus are necessar…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dendritic spine density is altered in both the mPFC and hippocampus of male rats following sexual activity.
“Additionally, dendritic spine density, a measure of neuroplasticity, is altered in both the mPFC and hippocampus of male rats following sexual activity, suggesting a potential mechanism for strengthening the association between memories of partner cues and reward [127,128].”
From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [127]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 56 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Glasper, E. R., LaMarca, E. A., Bocarsly, M. E., Fasolino, M., Opendak, M., & Gould, E.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gould, Elizabeth
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 125
- Pages
- 73-79
- ISSN
- 1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W862005726
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (F32 AG033461)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH0597405)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- sexual experience, mating, cognitive flexibility, set-shifting, dendritic spine density, medial prefrontal cortex, pyramidal neurons, dentate gyrus granule cells, ventral hippocampus, muscimol inactivation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Cognition, Dendrites, Female, Male, Set, Psychology, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Cell Shape, Dendritic Spines, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review