Cited by 21Memory and Neural MechanismsBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

NMDAR-dependent proteasome activity in the gustatory cortex is necessary for conditioned taste aversion

Rosenberg, Tali, Elkobi, Alina, Dieterich, Daniela C., Rosenblum, Kobi·2016·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Taste information is processed in different brain structures in the mammalian brain, including the gustatory cortex (GC), which resides within the insular cortex. N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) activity in the GC is necessary for the acquisition of conditioned taste aversion (CTA) but not positive novel taste learning. Previous studies have shown that taste memory consolidation requires intact protein synthesis in the GC. In addition, the direct involvement of translation initiation and elongation factors was documented in the GC during taste learning. However, protein expression is defined by protein synthesis, degradation, and localization. Protein degradation is critical for the consolidation and reconsolidation of other forms of learning, such as fear learning and addiction behavior, but its role in cortical-dependent learning is not clear. Here, we show for the first time that proteasome activity is specifically increased in the GC 4h following experiencing of a novel taste. This increase in proteasome activity was abolished by local administration to the GC of the NMDA antagonist, APV, as well as a CaMKII inhibitor, at the time of acquisition. In addition, local application of lactacystin, a proteasome inhibitor, resulted in impaired CTA, but not novel taste learning. These results suggest that NMDAR-dependent proteasome activity in the GC participates in the association process between novel taste experience and negative visceral sensation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.01.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 21

Authors
Rosenberg, T., Elkobi, A., Dieterich, D. C., & Rosenblum, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Rosenblum, Kobi
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
130
Pages
7-16
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2243884389
Cited by
21
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
conditioned taste aversion, gustatory cortex, insula, NMDA receptor, proteasome activity, protein degradation, lactacystin, APV, CaMKII, protein synthesis
MeSH terms
Acetylcysteine, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Psychological, Male, Somatosensory Cortex, Taste, Valine, Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Wistar, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Rats, Taste Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review