NMDAR-dependent proteasome activity in the gustatory cortex is necessary for conditioned taste aversion
Abstract
Taste information is processed in different brain structures in the mammalian brain, including the gustatory cortex (GC), which resides within the insular cortex. N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) activity in the GC is necessary for the acquisition of conditioned taste aversion (CTA) but not positive novel taste learning. Previous studies have shown that taste memory consolidation requires intact protein synthesis in the GC. In addition, the direct involvement of translation initiation and elongation factors was documented in the GC during taste learning. However, protein expression is defined by protein synthesis, degradation, and localization. Protein degradation is critical for the consolidation and reconsolidation of other forms of learning, such as fear learning and addiction behavior, but its role in cortical-dependent learning is not clear. Here, we show for the first time that proteasome activity is specifically increased in the GC 4h following experiencing of a novel taste. This increase in proteasome activity was abolished by local administration to the GC of the NMDA antagonist, APV, as well as a CaMKII inhibitor, at the time of acquisition. In addition, local application of lactacystin, a proteasome inhibitor, resulted in impaired CTA, but not novel taste learning. These results suggest that NMDAR-dependent proteasome activity in the GC participates in the association process between novel taste experience and negative visceral sensation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The regulation of this system has been linked to intracellular calcium signalling and NMDAR activation.
“The regulation of this system has been linked to intracellular calcium signalling (Da Silva et al., 2013; Jarome et al., 2016) and NMDAR activation (Rosenberg et al., 2016).”
From Retrieval-Dependent Mechanisms Affecting Emotional Memory Persistence: Reconsolidation, Extinction, and the Space in Between (2020) · cites this paper as Rosenberg et al., 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Rosenberg, T., Elkobi, A., Dieterich, D. C., & Rosenblum, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Rosenblum, Kobi
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 7-16
- ISSN
- 1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2243884389
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- conditioned taste aversion, gustatory cortex, insula, NMDA receptor, proteasome activity, protein degradation, lactacystin, APV, CaMKII, protein synthesis
- MeSH terms
- Acetylcysteine, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Psychological, Male, Somatosensory Cortex, Taste, Valine, Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Wistar, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Rats, Taste Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review