Evidence of VTA and LC control of protein synthesis required for the behavioral tagging process
Open accessAbstract
Several works have shown that the formation of different long-term memories relies on a behavioral tagging process. In other words, to establish a lasting memory, at least two parallel processes must occur: the setting of a learning tag (triggered during learning) that defines where a memory could be stored, and the synthesis of proteins, that once captured at tagged sites will effectively allow the consolidation process to occur. This work focused in studying which brain structures are responsible of controlling the synthesis of those proteins at the brain areas where memory is being stored. It combines electrical activation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and/or the locus coeruleus (LC), with local pharmacological interventions and weak and strong behavioral trainings in the inhibitory avoidance and spatial object recognition tasks in rats. The results presented here strongly support the idea that the VTA is a brain structure responsible for regulating the consolidation of memories acting through the D1/D5 dopaminergic receptors of the hippocampus to control the synthesis of new proteins required for this process. Moreover, they provide evidence that the LC may be a second structure with a similar role, acting independently and complementary to the VTA, through the β-adrenergic receptors of the hippocampus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pre-sample, but not pre-test, infusions of anisomycin into the dorsal hippocampus impaired long-term OPP memory in the rat.
“Pre-sample, but not pre-test (Ozawa et al., 2017), infusions of anisomycin into the dorsal hippocampus impaired long-term OPP memory in the rat (Moncada, 2017; Ozawa et al., 2014, 2017).”
Pre-sample microinjections of SCH23390 into the hippocampus impaired long-term (24 hours) OPP memory.
“but impaired long-term (24 hours) OPP memory”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Moncada, D.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Moncada, Diego
- ORCID
- Moncada, Diego
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 138
- Pages
- 226-237
- ISSN
- 1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2414058814
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- LIN-Magdeburg
- ANPCyT
- CONICET
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- memory consolidation, ventral tegmental area, locus coeruleus, protein synthesis, hippocampus, dopamine D1/D5 receptors, beta-adrenergic receptors, passive avoidance, electrical brain stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Memory Consolidation, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Animals, Anisomycin, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Animal, Benzazepines, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Memory, Muscimol, Neurons, Propranolol, Protein Synthesis Inhibitors, Protein Biosynthesis, Rats, Wistar, Ventral Tegmental Area, Dopamine Antagonists, Recognition, Psychology, Rats, GABA-A Receptor Agonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review