Cited by 50Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSleep and Wakefulness Research

Evidence of VTA and LC control of protein synthesis required for the behavioral tagging process

Open access
Moncada, Diego·2017·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Several works have shown that the formation of different long-term memories relies on a behavioral tagging process. In other words, to establish a lasting memory, at least two parallel processes must occur: the setting of a learning tag (triggered during learning) that defines where a memory could be stored, and the synthesis of proteins, that once captured at tagged sites will effectively allow the consolidation process to occur. This work focused in studying which brain structures are responsible of controlling the synthesis of those proteins at the brain areas where memory is being stored. It combines electrical activation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and/or the locus coeruleus (LC), with local pharmacological interventions and weak and strong behavioral trainings in the inhibitory avoidance and spatial object recognition tasks in rats. The results presented here strongly support the idea that the VTA is a brain structure responsible for regulating the consolidation of memories acting through the D1/D5 dopaminergic receptors of the hippocampus to control the synthesis of new proteins required for this process. Moreover, they provide evidence that the LC may be a second structure with a similar role, acting independently and complementary to the VTA, through the β-adrenergic receptors of the hippocampus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.06.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 50

Authors
Moncada, D.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Moncada, Diego
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
138
Pages
226-237
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2414058814
Cited by
50
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • LIN-Magdeburg
  • ANPCyT
  • CONICET
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
memory consolidation, ventral tegmental area, locus coeruleus, protein synthesis, hippocampus, dopamine D1/D5 receptors, beta-adrenergic receptors, passive avoidance, electrical brain stimulation
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Animals, Anisomycin, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Animal, Benzazepines, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Memory, Muscimol, Neurons, Propranolol, Protein Synthesis Inhibitors, Protein Biosynthesis, Rats, Wistar, Ventral Tegmental Area, Dopamine Antagonists, Recognition, Psychology, Rats, GABA-A Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review