Robots et agents virtuels au service des personnes âgées : une revue de l’actualité en gérontechnologie
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the last 10 years, few studies have addressed the use of ECAs among older adults with dementia.
“In fact, in the last 10 years, few studies have addressed the use of ECAs among older adults with dementia.”
This study mapped how the readiness level of ECA-based interventions grew across the years, shifting from a display on standard television sets and computer screens to mobile stand-alone solutions such as Anne.
“From a technical point of view, this study mapped how the readiness level of ECA-based interventions grew across the years, shifting from a display on standard television sets [7] and computer screens [8-12] to mobile stand-alone solutions such as in the specific case of Anne.”
This framework of 4 weeks of interaction between 20 seniors with dementia and the agent Anne in a home setting is rare in ECA research, which mainly comprises studies on short-term interaction in a controlled environment and smaller sample size enrollment.
“This framework is rare in ECA research, which mainly comprises studies on short-term interaction in a controlled environment [13] and smaller sample size enrollment [7-12].”
The quality of automatic speech recognition and synthesis is still a technical issue and has room for improvement, whereas touch screen modality is almost stable and positively used by people living with dementia.
“Unfortunately, our study confirms that the quality of automatic speech recognition and synthesis is still a technical issue and has room for improvement [7-11], whereas touch screen modality is almost stable and positively used by people living with dementia [3,25,26].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Wrobel, J., Pino, M., Wargnier, P., & Rigaud, A.-S.
- Affiliations
- Hôpital Cochin (FR)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Centre de Recherche en Informatique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Wrobel, J.
- Venue
- NPG Neurologie - Psychiatrie - Gériatrie
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 82
- Pages
- 184-193
- ISSN
- 1627-4830 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099883443
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NPG. Neurologie, psychiatrie, gériatrie/NPG (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- assistive robots, virtual agents, socially assistive robots, gerontechnology, older adults, dependent elderly, assistive technology, independent living, technology acceptance, geriatrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review