Cited by 13Social Robot Interaction and HRITechnology Use by Older AdultsAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Robots et agents virtuels au service des personnes âgées : une revue de l’actualité en gérontechnologie

Wrobel, J., Pino, M., Wargnier, P., Rigaud, A.-S.·2014·NPG Neurologie - Psychiatrie - Gériatrie

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.npg.2014.02.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 13

Authors
Wrobel, J., Pino, M., Wargnier, P., & Rigaud, A.-S.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Cochin (FR)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Centre de Recherche en Informatique (FR)
Corresponding author
Wrobel, J.
Venue
NPG Neurologie - Psychiatrie - Gériatrie
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
14
Issue
82
Pages
184-193
ISSN
1627-4830 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099883443
Cited by
13
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NPG. Neurologie, psychiatrie, gériatrie/NPG (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
assistive robots, virtual agents, socially assistive robots, gerontechnology, older adults, dependent elderly, assistive technology, independent living, technology acceptance, geriatrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review