Adolescent reward system perseveration due to nicotine: Studies with methylphenidate
Abstract
Previous data suggests adolescent nicotine exposure permanently disrupts reward systems. Behavioral pharmacological methods were used to assess the effects of adolescent nicotine exposure on methylphenidate (MPD) sensitivity and reward from adolescence to adulthood. For experiment one, testing was performed on adult mice exposed to nicotine (0.3 and 3.0 mg/kg, SC, M-F, b.i.d.) or saline during adolescence (PND 25-57). After a 28-day drug-free, time-off period, the locomotor effects (30 min, 30 cm traveled) of MPD (5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg, IP) were measured. Thereafter, mice underwent condition-place-preference testing (CPP). MPD (20 mg/kg) was paired with the subject's non-preferred side and saline with the preferred side. Conditioning sessions were conducted for 8 days with a drug-free post-test on the day following the final conditioning session. A second experiment was conducted to determine if adolescent mice respond differently to MPD compared to adult mice. The study compared adolescent mice (PND 25-46) to adult mice (PND 77-98) using identical MPD testing procedures as in experiment one. Adult subjects exposed to nicotine during adolescence behaved remarkably similar to adolescent subjects receiving only MPD. Both nicotine exposed subjects and naïve adolescents exhibited increased response to MPD's motor activating effects and a decreased response to MPD's rewarding effects. Taken together it appears that adolescent nicotine exposure retards the development of reward systems, thus, maintaining an adolescent state indefinitely, which could result in increased vulnerability to substance abuse problems throughout adulthood.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mice exposed to nicotine in adolescence show behavioral responses to methylphenidate as adults that closely resemble the responses of naïve adolescent animals.
“This idea was first proposed as mice exposed to nicotine in adolescence showed behavioral responses to methylphenidate as adults that closely resembled the responses of naïve adolescent animals [151].”
From Adolescent nicotine exposure and persistent neurocircuitry changes: unveiling lifelong psychiatric risks (2025) · cites this paper as [151]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Nolley, E. P., & Kelley, B. M.
- Affiliations
- Bridgewater College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelley, Brian M.
- ORCID
- Kelley, Brian M.
- Venue
- Neurotoxicology and Teratology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-56
- ISSN
- 0892-0362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007541696
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurotoxicology and Teratology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Thomas F. and Kate Miller Jeffress Memorial Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- adolescent nicotine exposure, perseveration, conditioned place preference, developmental neurotoxicity, mice
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Behavior, Animal, Body Weight, Conditioning, Operant, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Male, Methylphenidate, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Models, Psychological, Motor Activity, Nicotine, Reward, Time Factors, Nicotinic Agonists, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review