Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The minimal composite Higgs model and electroweak precision tests

Open access
Agashe, Kaustubh, Contino, Roberto·2006·Nuclear Physics B
DOI 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.02.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract A complete analysis of the electroweak precision observables is performed within a recently proposed minimal composite Higgs model, realized as a 5-dimensional warped compactification. In particular, we compute Z → b b ¯ and the one-loop correction to the ρ parameter. We find that oblique data can be easily reproduced without a significant amount of tuning in the parameters of the model, while Z → b b ¯ imposes a stronger constraint. As a consequence of the latter, some of the new fermionic resonances must have mass around 4 TeV, which corresponds to an electroweak fine tuning of a few percent. Other resonances, such as Z ′ , can be lighter in sizeable portions of the parameter space. We discuss in detail the origin of the Z → b b ¯ constraint and we suggest several possible avenues beyond the minimal model for weakening it.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.02.011

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
Agashe, K., & Contino, R.
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
742
Issue
1-3
Pages
59-85
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.02.011
OpenAlex
W2016758418
Cited by
226
References
5
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.