The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Model-independent implications of the e±, p¯ cosmic ray spectra on properties of Dark Matter
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Taking into account spins, we classify all two-body non-relativistic Dark Matter annihilation channels to the allowed polarization states of Standard Model particles, computing the energy spectra of the stable final-state particles relevant for indirect DM detection. We study the DM masses, annihilation channels and cross sections that can reproduce the PAMELA indications of an e + excess consistently with the PAMELA p ¯ data and the ATIC/PPB-BETS e + + e − data. From the PAMELA data alone, two solutions emerge: (i) either the DM particles that annihilate into W , Z , h must be heavier than about 10 TeV or (ii) the DM must annihilate only into leptons. Thus in both cases a DM particle compatible with the PAMELA excess seems to have quite unexpected properties. The solution (ii) implies a peak in the e + + e − energy spectrum, which, indeed, seems to appear in the ATIC/PPB-BETS data around 700 GeV. If upcoming data from ATIC-4 and GLAST confirm this feature, this would point to a O ( 1 ) TeV DM annihilating only into leptons. Otherwise the solution (i) would be favored. We comment on the implications of these results for DM models, direct DM detection and colliders as well as on the possibility of an astrophysical origin of the excess.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Cited by
Dark Matter as a Topological Vacuum Condensate
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06209 · Cited by 3,403
Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection
Feng, J. L. (2010) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659 · Cited by 1,448
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
PPPC 4 DM ID: a poor particle physicist cookbook for dark matter indirect detection
Cirelli, M., Corcella, G., Hektor, A., Hütsi, G., Kadastik, M., Panci, P., Raidal, M., Sala, F., & Strumia, A. (2011) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/051 · Cited by 783
Self-citationAstrophysical signatures of secluded dark matter
Pospelov, M., & Ritz, A. (2009) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.12.012 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Cirelli, M., Kadastik, M., Raidal, M., & Strumia, A.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 813
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072149896
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model-independent implications of the e±, p¯ cosmic ray spectra on properties of Dark Matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.031
- The paper
- Cirelli, M., Kadastik, M., Raidal, M., & Strumia, A. (2009). Model-independent implications of the e±, p¯ cosmic ray spectra on properties of Dark Matter. Nuclear Physics B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.