Cited by 72Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Comparison of epicardial, abdominal and regional fat compartments in response to weight loss

Kim, M.-K., Tanaka, K., Kim, M.-J., Matuso, T., Endo, T., Tomita, T., Maeda, S., Ajisaka, R.·2009·Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

Background and aims Echocardiographic measurement of epicardial fat (EF) seems to be a reliable and diagnostic marker of visceral adipose tissue (VAT). However, the weight loss-induced changes in EF have not been compared with those in VAT or the truncal depot. In this study, we aimed to compare the weight loss-induced changes in EF, VAT and other regional fat compartments in obese men.Methods and results In this study, 27 moderately obese men (age 45.8+/-1.7 years; body mass index 30.5+/-0.7 kg/m(2)) followed a daily low-calorie diet as part of a clinical 12-week weight loss interventional study. We evaluated the EF thickness by transthoracic echocardiography, assessed the abdominal fat tissues by computed tomography scans, and examined the regional and whole body fat compartments by dual X-ray absorptiometry. An average decrease of 26.8% in the initial calorie intake corresponded to post-program reductions of 17.2%, 11.0%, 16.6%, and 29.8% in EF thickness (P<0.001), body mass, percentage fat mass, and abdominal fat compartments, respectively. The percentage change in VAT in response to weight loss was twice as high as the substantial change in EF tissue (P<0.001).Conclusion The results of the study suggest that a low-calorie diet-induced weight loss decreases EF thickness. Moderate diet-induced weight loss alone may represent an effective nonpharmacological strategy for reducing EF, which is a unique, pathogenic fat depot and an emerging marker of VAT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.01.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 72

Authors
Kim, M.-K., Tanaka, K., Kim, M.-J., Matuso, T., Endo, T., Tomita, T., Maeda, S., & Ajisaka, R.
Affiliations
University of Tsukuba (JP)
Corresponding author
Kim, M.-K.
Venue
Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
760-766
ISSN
0939-4753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025737241
Cited by
72
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
epicardial adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, abdominal fat, weight loss, hypocaloric diet, obesity, fat mass reduction, truncal fat
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet, Reducing, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Pericardium, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, Weight Loss, Absorptiometry, Photon, Treatment Outcome, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Abdominal Fat, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review