Comparison of epicardial, abdominal and regional fat compartments in response to weight loss
Abstract
Background and aims Echocardiographic measurement of epicardial fat (EF) seems to be a reliable and diagnostic marker of visceral adipose tissue (VAT). However, the weight loss-induced changes in EF have not been compared with those in VAT or the truncal depot. In this study, we aimed to compare the weight loss-induced changes in EF, VAT and other regional fat compartments in obese men.Methods and results In this study, 27 moderately obese men (age 45.8+/-1.7 years; body mass index 30.5+/-0.7 kg/m(2)) followed a daily low-calorie diet as part of a clinical 12-week weight loss interventional study. We evaluated the EF thickness by transthoracic echocardiography, assessed the abdominal fat tissues by computed tomography scans, and examined the regional and whole body fat compartments by dual X-ray absorptiometry. An average decrease of 26.8% in the initial calorie intake corresponded to post-program reductions of 17.2%, 11.0%, 16.6%, and 29.8% in EF thickness (P<0.001), body mass, percentage fat mass, and abdominal fat compartments, respectively. The percentage change in VAT in response to weight loss was twice as high as the substantial change in EF tissue (P<0.001).Conclusion The results of the study suggest that a low-calorie diet-induced weight loss decreases EF thickness. Moderate diet-induced weight loss alone may represent an effective nonpharmacological strategy for reducing EF, which is a unique, pathogenic fat depot and an emerging marker of VAT.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with moderate and severe obesity, weight loss induced by low-calorie diets and exercise reduces BMI, visceral fat, and EAT.
“In patients with moderate and severe obesity, a weight loss induced by low-calorie diets and exercise showed reductions of BMI, visceral fat and EAT [138].”
From Dysregulated epicardial adipose tissue as a risk factor and potential therapeutic target of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in diabetes (2022) · cites this paper as [138]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Kim, M.-K., Tanaka, K., Kim, M.-J., Matuso, T., Endo, T., Tomita, T., Maeda, S., & Ajisaka, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Tsukuba (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, M.-K.
- Venue
- Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 760-766
- ISSN
- 0939-4753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025737241
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Keywords
- epicardial adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, abdominal fat, weight loss, hypocaloric diet, obesity, fat mass reduction, truncal fat
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diet, Reducing, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Pericardium, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, Weight Loss, Absorptiometry, Photon, Treatment Outcome, Intra-Abdominal Fat, Abdominal Fat, Adiposity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review