Effect of proteins from different sources on body composition
Abstract
High-protein diets have beneficial effects on body fat regulation, but the difference in effect of various types of protein is not known. Thus, this review examines whether proteins from different sources have similar effects on body composition and energy balance. Animal proteins, especially those from dairy, seem to support better muscle protein synthesis than plant proteins. This could potentially enhance energy expenditure, but no conclusion can be drawn from the scant evidence. Some studies, but not all, demonstrate the higher satiating effect of whey and fish proteins than other protein sources. The evidence from intervention studies comparing the effects of different protein sources on body weight is inconclusive. However, body composition was not evaluated precisely in these studies and the literature is still incomplete (e.g. comparative data are missing for legumes and nuts). Protein intake enhances energy expenditure, satiety and fat loss, but there is no clear evidence to indicate whether there is a difference in the effect dependent on the source of the protein, i.e. from animal or plant-based foods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Animal protein is deemed as high quality because it provides all essential amino acids in sufficient quantities and tends to be well digested.
“Animal protein is deemed as “high quality” because it provides all the essential amino acids (EAAs) in sufficient quantities, and tends to be well digested [52].”
From Animal Protein versus Plant Protein in Supporting Lean Mass and Muscle Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
Plant protein, including soy, is deficient in specific essential amino acids.
“Plant protein, including soy, is deficient in specific EAAs [15,52].”
From Animal Protein versus Plant Protein in Supporting Lean Mass and Muscle Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 112 · Cited by 207
- Authors
- Gilbert, J.-A., Bendsen, N. T., Tremblay, A., & Astrup, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Astrup, A.
- Venue
- Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- B16-B31
- ISSN
- 0939-4753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097518407
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs
- Nordea-fonden
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
- Keywords
- protein sources, body composition, high-protein diet, muscle protein synthesis, energy balance, energy expenditure, satiety, whey protein, fish protein, milk protein, plant proteins, Fabaceae, nuts, fat loss, body weight
- MeSH terms
- Whey Proteins, Appetite, Body Composition, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Food Preferences, Humans, Milk Proteins, Oxidation-Reduction, Satiation, Weight Loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review