Contemporary assessment and pharmacotherapy of Tourette syndrome
Open accessAbstract
To develop a guide to clinical assessment and pharmacotherapy for children and adults with Tourette syndrome (TS), we reviewed published literature over the past 25 years to identify original articles and reviews on the assessment and pharmacological treatment of Tourette syndrome, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The literature search also included a survey of reviews published in book chapters. The assessment section was compiled from several reviews. Pharmacological treatments were classified into those with strong empirical support (as evidenced by two positive placebo-controlled studies for tics, OCD, or ADHD in TS samples); modest empirical support (one positive placebo-controlled study), or minimal support (open-label data only). We conclude that accurate diagnosis, including identification of comorbid conditions, is an essential step toward appropriate treatment for patients with TS. In many patients with TS, symptom management requires pharmacotherapy for tics or coexisting conditions. The evidence supporting efficacy and safety for medications used in patients with TS varies. But this evidence offers the best guide to clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 240 · Cited by 300
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [16]Diagnostic and statistical manual, fourth edition: treatment revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- [58]Silay YS, Vuong KD, Jankovic J. The efficacy and safety of fluphenazine in patients with tourette syndrome. Neurology. 2004;62:A506–A506. [Google Scholar]
- [125]Riddle MA, King RA, Hardin MT, Scahill L, Ort SI, Leckman JF. Behavioral side effects of fluoxetine. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 1991;3:193–198. doi: 10.1089/cap.1997.7.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [186]Expert Consensus Guideline Series Treatment of bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57:3–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Authors
- Scahill, L., Erenberg, G., Berlin, C. M., Budman, C., Coffey, B. J., Jankovic, J., Kiessling, L., King, R. A., Kurlan, R., Lang, A., Mink, J., Murphy, T., Zinner, S., & Walkup, J.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Tourette Association of America (US)
- Corresponding author
- Scahill, Lawrence
- ORCID
- Venue
- NeuroRX
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-206
- ISSN
- 1545-5343 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3593444
- OpenAlex
- W2107625357
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 240
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- NeuroRx (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
- Keywords
- Tourette syndrome, tic disorders, pharmacotherapy, clinical evaluation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, comorbidities, children and adults
- MeSH terms
- Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Tourette Syndrome, Humans, Neurology, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Tics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review