Cited by 8Nutritional Studies and DietFood composition and propertiesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Brazil’s staple food and incident diabetes

Garcia Rosa, Maria Luiza, Falcão, Paula M., Massae Yokoo, Edna, Antunes da Cruz Filho, Rubens, Miranda Alcoforado, Veronica, da Silva Nalin de Souza, Barbara, Neves Pinto, Fernanda, Barreto Nery, Aline·2014·Nutrition

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the association of Brazil's staple food, rice, beans and manioc, and the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) in adults assisted by a Brazilian Family Doctor Program (FDP).Methods The baseline information was collected on visits to 13 units of the FDP from July 2006 to December 2007 (CAMELIA Study). The units were revisited by trained researchers between July and December 2011, who reviewed medical records of all participants of the baseline. Biochemical, anthropometrical and blood pressure measurements, new diagnoses, and medical prescriptions were collected. Individuals ages ≥20 y, who were non-diabetic at baseline were included (N = 409). Food consumption was estimated using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Incident of diabetes was classified according to fasting serum glucose (≥126 mg/dL), individual's use of antidiabetic drugs, and/or diagnosis of diabetes described in the medical record. Individuals who were negative at baseline and also were negative for the above conditions were classified as non-diabetics.Results Individuals who developed T2DM (N = 30) reported higher consumption of red meat and beans and less consumption of cassava flour, independent of the interval between visits and other potential confounding variables. The cassava flour showed a protective effect (relative risk, 0.910; 95% confidence interval, 0.842-0.982).Conclusions The consumption of cassava flour, a low-cost product, could be considered in diets for the prevention and control of diabetes. The hypothesis must be investigated in cohorts from different populations and tested in randomized controlled trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nut.2013.09.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 8

Authors
Garcia Rosa, M. L., Falcão, P. M., Massae Yokoo, E., Antunes da Cruz Filho, R., Miranda Alcoforado, V., da Silva Nalin de Souza, B., Neves Pinto, F., & Barreto Nery, A.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
Venue
Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
365-368
ISSN
0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081741980
Cited by
8
References
20
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cassava flour, rice, beans, cassava, staple foods, dietary intake, diabetes incidence, red meat consumption, diabetes prevention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brazil, Manihot, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Fabaceae, Male, Meat, Middle Aged, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review