Cited by 52Garlic and Onion StudiesLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthNatural Products and Biological Research

Effect of garlic on plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

Sahebkar, Amirhossein, Serban, Corina, Ursoniu, Sorin, Banach, Maciej·2016·Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives Garlic can play an essential role in the prevention of atherosclerosis, but the research addressing the effect of garlic on the concentration of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has not been fully demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of garlic on plasma Lp(a) concentrations through systematic review of literature and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials.Methods The literature search included SCOPUS, PubMed-Medline, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases up to March 10, 2015 to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of garlic on plasma Lp(a) concentrations. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. Overall, the effect of garlic on plasma Lp(a) levels was reported in six trials.Results Meta-analysis did not suggest a significant alteration in plasma Lp(a) levels after garlic consumption (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 16.86%; 95% confidence interval, -4.59 to 38.31; P = 0.124). This result was robust in the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. When the studies were categorized according to the duration of supplementation, there was no effect in the subgroup of trials lasting ≤12 wk (WMD = 2.01%; 95% CI, -14.67 to 18.68; P = 0.813) but a significant elevation of plasma Lp(a) concentrations was found in trials lasting >12 wk (WMD = 54.59%; 95% CI, 30.47-78.71; P < 0.001). Random-effects meta-regression suggested an inverse association between the changes in plasma concentrations of Lp(a) and duration of supplementation (slope 1.71; 95% CI, 0.46-2.97; P = 0.007).Conclusions The present meta-analysis did not suggest a significant effect of garlic supplementation on the reduction of Lp(a) levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nut.2015.06.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 52

Authors
Sahebkar, A., Serban, C., Ursoniu, S., & Banach, M.
Affiliations
  • Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Corresponding author
Banach, Maciej
Venue
Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
33-40
ISSN
0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1894574165
Cited by
52
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Garlic and Onion Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Natural Products and Biological Research
Keywords
garlic, garlic supplementation, lipoprotein(a), plasma Lp(a) concentration, atherosclerosis prevention, duration of supplementation, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Garlic, Humans, Lipoprotein(a), Dietary Supplements, Plant Preparations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review