Cited by 105Vitamin D Research StudiesMuscle Physiology and DisordersNutrition and Health in Aging

Vitamin D, Muscle Recovery, Sarcopenia, Cachexia, and Muscle Atrophy

Garcia, Matheus, Seelaender, Marilia, Sotiropoulos, Athanassia, Coletti, Dario, Lancha, Antonio Herbert·2019·Nutrition

Abstract

The relevance of vitamin D to skeletal muscle metabolism has been highlighted in recent years. The interest arises from the important findings of studies demonstrating multiple effects of vitamin D on this tissue, which can be divided into genomic (direct effects) and non-genomic effects (indirect effects). Another important aspect to be considered in the study of vitamin D and muscle fiber metabolism is related to different expression of vitamin D receptor (VDR), which varies in muscle tissue depending on age, sex, and pathology. The correlation between low circulating levels of vitamin D and muscle metabolism disorders is documented in various contexts, including muscle recovery, atrophy, sarcopenia, and cachexia. The aim of this review was to analyze recent results of both in vitro and in vivo studies to address the relationship between vitamin D and skeletal muscle biology. The words muscle atrophy, muscle hypertrophy, sarcopenia, and cachexia were crossed over with vitamin D in a Pubmed search. All original contributions, along with reviews on the topic, were included, and no publications in the past 10 y were discarded. The papers retrieved different topics such as vitamin D in skeletal muscle; vitamin D in circulation; vitamin D, sarcopenia, and muscle atrophy; vitamin D and cachexia; and vitamin D and muscle recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nut.2018.09.031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to development of muscle atrophy and possible mechanism is related to increased expression of MAFbx and protein degradation.

    “Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to the development of muscle atrophy and the possible mechanism is related to the increased expression of MAFbx and protein degradation [59].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 105

Authors
Garcia, M., Seelaender, M., Sotiropoulos, A., Coletti, D., & Lancha, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Institut Cochin (FR)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Garcia, Matheus
Venue
Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
60
Pages
66-69
ISSN
0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896475875
Cited by
105
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
vitamin D, skeletal muscle, sarcopenia, cachexia, muscle atrophy, muscle recovery, muscle hypertrophy, vitamin D receptor, muscle fiber metabolism
MeSH terms
Cachexia, Humans, Hypertrophy, Muscular Atrophy, Vitamin D, Receptors, Calcitriol, Muscle, Skeletal, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review