Vitamin D, Muscle Recovery, Sarcopenia, Cachexia, and Muscle Atrophy
Abstract
The relevance of vitamin D to skeletal muscle metabolism has been highlighted in recent years. The interest arises from the important findings of studies demonstrating multiple effects of vitamin D on this tissue, which can be divided into genomic (direct effects) and non-genomic effects (indirect effects). Another important aspect to be considered in the study of vitamin D and muscle fiber metabolism is related to different expression of vitamin D receptor (VDR), which varies in muscle tissue depending on age, sex, and pathology. The correlation between low circulating levels of vitamin D and muscle metabolism disorders is documented in various contexts, including muscle recovery, atrophy, sarcopenia, and cachexia. The aim of this review was to analyze recent results of both in vitro and in vivo studies to address the relationship between vitamin D and skeletal muscle biology. The words muscle atrophy, muscle hypertrophy, sarcopenia, and cachexia were crossed over with vitamin D in a Pubmed search. All original contributions, along with reviews on the topic, were included, and no publications in the past 10 y were discarded. The papers retrieved different topics such as vitamin D in skeletal muscle; vitamin D in circulation; vitamin D, sarcopenia, and muscle atrophy; vitamin D and cachexia; and vitamin D and muscle recovery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to development of muscle atrophy and possible mechanism is related to increased expression of MAFbx and protein degradation.
“Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to the development of muscle atrophy and the possible mechanism is related to the increased expression of MAFbx and protein degradation [59].”
From Nutraceuticals in the Prevention and Treatment of the Muscle Atrophy (2021) · cites this paper as [59]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Garcia, M., Seelaender, M., Sotiropoulos, A., Coletti, D., & Lancha, A. H.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Institut Cochin (FR)
- Sorbonne Université (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Garcia, Matheus
- Venue
- Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 66-69
- ISSN
- 0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896475875
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- vitamin D, skeletal muscle, sarcopenia, cachexia, muscle atrophy, muscle recovery, muscle hypertrophy, vitamin D receptor, muscle fiber metabolism
- MeSH terms
- Cachexia, Humans, Hypertrophy, Muscular Atrophy, Vitamin D, Receptors, Calcitriol, Muscle, Skeletal, Sarcopenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review