The role of muscle ultrasound to predict sarcopenia
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to provide data about the role of muscle ultrasound (US) to predict sarcopenia. Methods A total of 313 geriatric outpatients (age ≥65 y) were enrolled in the study. After a comprehensive geriatric assessment, anthropometric measurement and handgrip strength (HGS) data were obtained and a bioelectrical impedance analysis was performed. Sarcopenia was diagnosed using HGS and bioelectrical impedance analysis data. Gastrocnemius medialis (GC), rectus femoris (RF), and rectus abdominis (RA) muscle thickness as well as the RF cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured with US. The role of muscle US to predict sarcopenia was defined with a receiver operating characteristics analysis. Results The prevalence of probable and confirmed sarcopenia were 43.8% (n = 137) and 13.4% (n = 42), respectively. All muscle US parameters had positive correlations with both HGS and the fat-free mass index. There were inverse correlations between all muscle US parameters and the five-item sarcopenia questionnaire. The RF CSA had stronger correlations with the five-item sarcopenia questionnaire, HGS, and the fat-free mass index than others. The values of GC, RF, and RA muscle thickness and the RF CSA to predict sarcopenia for women/men were 13.9/13.8 mm (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.817/0.707 mm), 13/15.5 mm (AUC: 0.760/0.736 mm), 4.3/5.2 cm 2 (AUC: 0.766/0.773 cm 2 ), and 6.6/7.0 mm (AUC: 0.740/0.688 mm), respectively. Conclusions GC, RF, and RA muscle thickness and the RF C…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Muscle ultrasound (MU) has proven to be an effective tool for diagnosing and monitoring sarcopenia, particularly in older adults and hospitalized patients.
“It has proven to be an effective tool for diagnosing and monitoring sarcopenia, particularly in older adults and hospitalized patients [15].”
From The Seven Methods for the Evaluation of Nutritional Status—ABCDEFG: Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
The reliability and validity of ultrasound to quantify muscles in older adults: A systematic review
Nijholt, W., Scafoglieri, A., Jager‐Wittenaar, H., Hobbelen, J. S. M., & van der Schans, C. P. (2017) · Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12210 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Performance of SARC-F in Regard to Sarcopenia Definitions, Muscle Mass and Functional Measures
Bahat, G., Yilmaz, O., Kiliç, C., Oren, M. M., & Karan, M. A. (2018) · The Journal of nutrition, health and aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-018-1067-8 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zanotelli, A., Rossi, A. P., Del Monte, L., Vantini, G., Stabile, G., Urbani, S., Giani, A., Zoico, E., Babbanini, A., Fantin, F., et al. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16152429 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
The Seven Methods for the Evaluation of Nutritional Status—ABCDEFG: Narrative Review
Zambrano-Villacres, R., Arteaga-Pazmiño, C., Guevara Castillo, W. D., Herrera-Fontana, M. E., Domínguez Brito, L. D., Becerra Granados, L. M., Recoba-Obregón, P. E., Rodríguez-Veintimilla, D., Bressi, V., Andrade-Molina, D., et al. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16020845 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ultrasound-derived muscle variables and physical function in older adults: A scoping review.
Phillip, J. G., Brockhattingen, K. K., Kaarsbo, T., Kristensen, M. T., Ryg, J., Suetta, C., Masud, T., & Minet, L. R. (2026) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2026.106151 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ozturk, Y., Koca, M., Burkuk, S., Unsal, P., Dikmeer, A., Oytun, M. G., Bas, A. O., Kahyaoglu, Z., Deniz, O., Coteli, S., Ileri, I., Dogu, B. B., Cankurtaran, M., & Halil, M.
- Affiliations
- Hacettepe University (TR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 101
- Pages
- 111692
- ISSN
- 0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4224294955
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Keywords
- sarcopenia, muscle ultrasound, sarcopenia prediction, geriatric outpatients, grip strength, bioelectrical impedance analysis, fat-free mass index, rectus femoris cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Ultrasonography, Muscle, Skeletal, Hand Strength, Quadriceps Muscle, Muscle Strength, Sarcopenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review