Cited by 74Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Participation in mindfulness-based stress reduction is not associated with reductions in emotional eating or uncontrolled eating

Kearney, David J., Milton, Meredith L., Malte, Carol A., McDermott, Kelly A., Martinez, Michelle, Simpson, Tracy L.·2012·Nutrition Research

Abstract

The adverse health effects and increasing prevalence of obesity in the United States make interventions for obesity a priority in health research. Diet-focused interventions generally do not result in lasting reductions in weight. Behavioral interventions that increase awareness of eating cues and satiety have been postulated to result in healthier eating habits. We hypothesized that participation in a program called mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) would positively influence the eating behaviors and nutritional intake of participants through changes in emotional eating (EE), uncontrolled eating (UE), and type and quantity of food consumed. Forty-eight veterans at a large urban Veterans Administration medical center were assessed before MBSR, after MBSR, and 4 months later. For all participants (N = 48), MBSR participation was not associated with significant changes in EE or UE. In addition, there were no significant differences in the intake of energy, fat, sugar, fruit, or vegetables at either follow-up time point as compared with baseline. Enhanced mindfulness skills and reduced depressive symptoms were seen over time with medium to large effect sizes. Changes in mindfulness skills were significantly and negatively correlated with changes in EE and UE over time. Overall, there was no evidence that participation in MBSR was associated with beneficial changes in eating through reductions in disinhibited eating or significant changes in dietary intake. Randomized studies are needed to further define the relationship between mindfulness program participation and eating behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nutres.2012.05.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 74

Authors
Kearney, D. J., Milton, M. L., Malte, C. A., McDermott, K. A., Martinez, M., & Simpson, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Bastyr University (US)
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Kearney, David J.
Venue
Nutrition Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
413-420
ISSN
0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003513678
Cited by
74
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, emotional eating, uncontrolled eating, dietary habits, dietary intake, obesity, veterans, mindfulness skills, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Choice Behavior, Depression, Eating, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Food Preferences, Fruit, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, United States, Vegetables, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review