Participation in mindfulness-based stress reduction is not associated with reductions in emotional eating or uncontrolled eating
Abstract
The adverse health effects and increasing prevalence of obesity in the United States make interventions for obesity a priority in health research. Diet-focused interventions generally do not result in lasting reductions in weight. Behavioral interventions that increase awareness of eating cues and satiety have been postulated to result in healthier eating habits. We hypothesized that participation in a program called mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) would positively influence the eating behaviors and nutritional intake of participants through changes in emotional eating (EE), uncontrolled eating (UE), and type and quantity of food consumed. Forty-eight veterans at a large urban Veterans Administration medical center were assessed before MBSR, after MBSR, and 4 months later. For all participants (N = 48), MBSR participation was not associated with significant changes in EE or UE. In addition, there were no significant differences in the intake of energy, fat, sugar, fruit, or vegetables at either follow-up time point as compared with baseline. Enhanced mindfulness skills and reduced depressive symptoms were seen over time with medium to large effect sizes. Changes in mindfulness skills were significantly and negatively correlated with changes in EE and UE over time. Overall, there was no evidence that participation in MBSR was associated with beneficial changes in eating through reductions in disinhibited eating or significant changes in dietary intake. Randomized studies are needed to further define the relationship between mindfulness program participation and eating behaviors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Findings on weight loss after mindfulness are mixed, with some studies but not all reporting weight improvements.
“Findings on weight loss after mindfulness have been mixed, with some31–37 but not all38,39 studies reporting improvements in weight.”
From A Mindfulness-Based Intervention to Control Weight After Bariatric Surgery: Preliminary Results From a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial (2016) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 74
- Authors
- Kearney, D. J., Milton, M. L., Malte, C. A., McDermott, K. A., Martinez, M., & Simpson, T. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Bastyr University (US)
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kearney, David J.
- Venue
- Nutrition Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 413-420
- ISSN
- 0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003513678
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based stress reduction, emotional eating, uncontrolled eating, dietary habits, dietary intake, obesity, veterans, mindfulness skills, depressive symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Energy Intake, Choice Behavior, Depression, Eating, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Food Preferences, Fruit, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, United States, Vegetables, Meditation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review