Cited by 42Celiac Disease Research and ManagementEosinophilic EsophagitisChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Swedish children with celiac disease comply well with a gluten-free diet, and most include oats without reporting any adverse effects: a long-term follow-up study

Tapsas, Dimitrios, Fälth-Magnusson, Karin, Högberg, Lotta, Hammersjö, Jan-Åke, Hollén, Elisabet·2014·Nutrition Research

Abstract

The only known treatment for celiac disease is a gluten-free diet (GFD), which initially meant abstention from wheat, rye, barley, and oats. Recently, oats free from contamination with wheat have been accepted in the GFD. Yet, reports indicate that all celiac disease patients may not tolerate oats. We hypothesized that celiac children comply well with a GFD and that most have included oats in their diet. A food questionnaire was used to check our patients; 316 questionnaires were returned. Mean time on the GFD was 6.9 years, and 96.8% of the children reported that they were trying to keep a strict GFD. However, accidental transgressions occurred in 263 children (83.2%). In 2 of 3 cases, mistakes took place when the patients were not at home. Symptoms after incidental gluten intake were experienced by 162 (61.6%) patients, mostly (87.5%) from the gastrointestinal tract. Small amounts of gluten (<4 g) caused symptoms in 38% of the cases, and 68% reported symptoms during the first 3 hours after gluten consumption. Oats were included in the diet of 89.4% of the children for a mean of 3.4 years. Most (81.9%) ate purified oats, and 45.3% consumed oats less than once a week. Among those who did not consume oats, only 5.9% refrained because of symptoms. General compliance with the GFD was good. Only the duration of the GFD appeared to influence adherence to the diet. Most patients did not report adverse effects after long-term consumption of oats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.04.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tapsas, D., Fälth-Magnusson, K., Högberg, L., Hammersjö, J.-Å., & Hollén, E.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Tapsas, Dimitrios
Venue
Nutrition Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
436-441
ISSN
0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140717818
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
celiac disease, gluten-free diet, dietary adherence, children, oat, gluten intolerance, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Celiac Disease, Edible Grain, Child, Child, Preschool, Feeding Behavior, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Glutens, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Avena, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review