Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research has not found consistent effects of surface- or deep-level diversity on team functioning.
“Nonetheless, previous research has not found consistent effects of surface-or deep-level diversity on team functioning (Bowers, Pharmer, & Salas, 2000;Van Dijk, Van Engen, & Van Knippenberg, 2012;Webber & Donahue, 2001).”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Van Dijk, Van Engen, & Van Knippenberg, 2012
The review found that team diversity often has no consistent direct effects on team processes and outcomes.
“Altogether, our review corroborates metaanalytical findings (Van Dijk et al., 2012) that team diversity often has no consistent direct effects on team processes and outcomes.”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Van Dijk et al., 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 201 · Cited by 514
- Authors
- van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & van Knippenberg, D.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-53
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108254762
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 201
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 33.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- demographic diversity, team diversity, team performance, innovation performance, in-role performance, rater bias, task complexity, performance evaluation (human resources), diversity effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
