The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
Knight, F. H. (1921) · Cited by 9,948
Optimization of conditional value-at-risk
Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000) · The Journal of Risk · doi:10.21314/jor.2000.038 · Cited by 6,725
“Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives”
(2016) · AMBER – ABBS Management Business and Entrepreneurship Review · doi:10.23874/amber/2016/v7/i1/121351 · Cited by 5,007
Options, Futures and Other Derivatives
Kariya, T., & Liu, R. Y. (2003) · Asset Pricing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9230-7_2 · Cited by 3,864
Building the Resilient Supply Chain
Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090410700275 · Cited by 3,664
Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking
March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404 · Cited by 3,183
Perspectives in supply chain risk management
Tang, C. S. (2006) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006 · Cited by 2,577
Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090910954873 · Cited by 2,530
Cited by
Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 · Cited by 4,118
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
Aven, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 · Cited by 1,713
“Heckmann et al. (2015) point to the lack of clarity in understanding what the supply chain risk concept means, and search for solutions.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBaryannis, G., Validi, S., Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1530476 · Cited by 1,015
Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems – A discussion of recent research
Mattsson, L.-G., & Jenelius, E. (2015) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002 · Cited by 846
Supply chain finance: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis
Xu, X., Chen, X., Jia, F., Brown, S., Gong, Y., & Xu, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.003 · Cited by 758
Metadata
- Authors
- Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S.
- Venue
- Omega
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 119-132
- ISSN
- 0305-0483 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983277437
- Cited by
- 885
- References
- 105
- FWCI
- 175.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004
- The paper
- Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
