Cited by 75Extraction and Separation ProcessesAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

Profitable Recycling of Low-Cobalt Lithium-Ion Batteries Will Depend on New Process Developments

Open access
Gaines, Linda·2019·One Earth

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recycling technologies differ in recycled materials, chemical forms, recovery efficiencies, and economic prospects.

    “Recycling technologies differ in recycled materials, chemical forms, recovery efficiencies, and economic prospects 46,67,68 (Fig. 5).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 5 · Cited by 75

Authors
Gaines, L.
Affiliations
Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Gaines, Linda
Venue
One Earth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
413-415
ISSN
2590-3322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2994717044
Cited by
75
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • One Earth (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Argonne National Laboratory
  • University of Chicago
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
lithium-ion battery recycling, electric vehicles, recycling profitability, cobalt recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review