Science Must Embrace Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge to Solve Our Biodiversity Crisis
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pressure is mounting across legal and practical spheres and from institutional to global scales to pair Indigenous knowledge systems together with Western scientific practices.
“Pressure is mounting across spheres (i.e.legal, practical; see Table 2) and scales (institutional to global) to pair Indigenous knowledge systems together with Western scientific practices (Ogar et al., 2020).”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Ogar et al., 2020
The paper’s title calls for science to embrace Traditional and Indigenous knowledge, and the available text lists a “Working in Partnership” section. Those passages support pairing knowledge systems, but they do not establish mounting pressure across legal and practical spheres or from institutional to global scales. The available body text is largely unreadable, so those specifics cannot be checked. (LLM, conf=0.69)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 16 · Cited by 192
- Authors
- Ogar, E., Pecl, G., & Mustonen, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Pecl, Gretta
- Venue
- One Earth
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-165
- ISSN
- 2590-3322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3047562532
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- One Earth (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- traditional knowledge, indigenous knowledge, biodiversity crisis, biodiversity conservation, rewilding, rights-based conservation, Western science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
