The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To summarize the potential benefits and risks of maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) use in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment and outcomes and to provide clinical guidance to dental practitioners. METHODS: This statement was developed by consensus agreement of a panel convened by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (AAOMR). The literature on the clinical efficacy of and radiation dose concepts associated with CBCT in all aspects of orthodontic practice was reviewed. RESULTS: The panel concluded that the use of CBCT in orthodontic treatment should be justified on an individual basis, based on clinical presentation. This statement provides general recommendations, specific use selection recommendations, optimization protocols, and radiation-dose, risk-assessment strategies for CBCT imaging in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The AAOMR supports the safe use of CBCT in dentistry. This position statement is periodically revised to reflect new evidence and, without reapproval, becomes invalid after 5 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Brenner, D. J., Elliston, C. D., Hall, E. J., & Berdon, W. E. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 · Cited by 3,222 · cited 1×
“In 200-202 Because it is important to consider the increased risks associated with exposing children to ionizing radiation, the American College of Radiology (ACR) has incorporated pediatric, effective-dose estimates in relative radiation level (RRL) designations for speci fi c imaging procedures…”
BackgroundPreston, D. L., Shimizu, Y., Pierce, D. A., Suyama, A., & Mabuchi, K. (2003) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3049 · Cited by 1,172
Little, R. M., Wallen, T. R., & Riedel, R. A. (1981) · American Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1016/0002-9416(81)90171-8 · Cited by 526
Oberoi, S., & Knueppel, S. (2012) · Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.035 · Cited by 104
Cited by
CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use
Kapila, S. D., & Nervina, J. M. (2015) · Dentomaxillofacial Radiology · doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140282 · Cited by 423
Gazzani, F., Ruellas, A. C. D. O., Faltin, K., Franchi, L., Cozza, P., Bigliazzi, R., Cevidanes, L. H. S., & Lione, R. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/2568235 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Venue
- Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-257
- ISSN
- 2212-4403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4211012536
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 22.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.002
- The paper
- Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. (2013). Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
