Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in 4 Racial/Ethnic Groups in the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Abstract
Objective To describe the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in 4 racial/ethnic groups (white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese) that participated in the second examination of the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).Design Prospective cohort study.Participants Six thousand one hundred seventy-six 45- to 85-year-old subjects selected from 6 United States communities.Methods Fundus images were taken using a 45 degrees digital camera through dark-adapted pupils and were graded for drusen size, type, area, increased retinal pigment, retinal pigment epithelial depigmentation, neovascular lesions, and geographic atrophy using the modified Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System.Main outcome measure Age-related macular degeneration.Results Prevalences of AMD were 2.4% (black), 4.2% (Hispanic), 4.6% (Chinese), to 5.4% (white) (P<0.001 for any differences among groups). The highest prevalence of any AMD occurred in those 75 to 84 years old, varying from 7.4% in blacks to 15.8% in whites and Chinese (P = 0.03). Estimated prevalences of late AMD were 0.3% (black), 0.2% (Hispanic), 0.6% (white), and 1.0% (Chinese). These differences were marginally significant (age and gender adjusted, P = 0.08). The frequency of exudative AMD was highest in Chinese (age- and gender-adjusted odds ratio, 4.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-14.27) compared with whites. Differences in age, gender, pupil size, body mass index, smoking, alcohol drinking history, diabetes, and hypertension status did not explain the variability among the 4 racial/ethnic groups.Conclusions Low prevalences of AMD were found in the MESA cohort in all groups. A lower prevalence of AMD was found in blacks compared with whites. The higher prevalence of exudative AMD in Chinese needs further study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, the prevalence of AMD in persons aged 45 to 85 years was 2.4% in African-Americans, 4.2% in Hispanics, 4.6% in Chinese-descent individuals, and 5.4% in Caucasians.
“An analysis of U.S. participants in the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) showed the prevalence of AMD in persons aged 45 to 85 years to be 2.4% in African-Americans, 4.2% in Hispanics, 4.6% in Chinese-descent individuals, and 5.4% in Caucasians (94).”
From Unraveling a Multifactorial Late-Onset Disease: From Genetic Susceptibility to Disease Mechanisms for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2009) · cites this paper as [94]
The Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis showed the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in individuals aged 45-85 years to be 2.4% in African-American people, 4.2% in Hispanic individuals, 4.6% in Chinese, and 5.4% in white individuals.
“More recently, the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis showed the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in individuals aged 45–85 years to be 2·4% in African-American people, 4·2% in Hispanic individuals, 4·6% in Chinese, and 5·4% in white individuals.43”
From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 399
- Authors
- Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Knudtson, M. D., Wong, T. Y., Cotch, M. F., Liu, K., Burke, G., Saad, M. F., & Jacobs, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Wake Forest University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-380
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167535056
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 18.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (Z99 EY999999)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL6997903, R01HL069979)
- National Eye Institute (Z01EY000403, ZIAEY000403)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Keywords
- age-related macular degeneration, prevalence, racial and ethnic differences, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, late AMD, exudative AMD, drusen, retinal pigment epithelium, geographic atrophy, Chinese Americans, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, White Americans
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Pupil, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Black People, White People, Asian People, Atherosclerosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review