Cited by 109Retinal Development and DisordersRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research

Phenotypic Variability in RDH5 Retinopathy (Fundus Albipunctatus)

Sergouniotis, Panagiotis I., Sohn, Elliott H., Li, Zheng, McBain, Vikki A., Wright, Genevieve A., Moore, Anthony T., Robson, Anthony G., Holder, Graham E. +1 more·2011·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose To describe phenotypic variability and report novel mutational data in patients with mutation in RDH5 (fundus albipunctatus). Design Retrospective case series. Participants Nine patients from 8 families (aged 7-55 years) with night blindness and electrophysiologic or fundoscopic findings in keeping with RDH5 mutation were ascertained. Methods Detailed ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and electrophysiologic assessment were performed. The coding region and intron-exon boundaries of RDH5 were analyzed. Main outcome measures RDH5 mutation status and resultant clinical and functional characteristics. Results Eleven mutations in RDH5 were detected in the 8 families in the study, with 9 of these changes being novel. Visual acuity was normal in all but 1 eye of a patient with adult-onset central visual loss. Most patients had white dots extending into the mid-periphery on fundus examination, consistent with fundus albipunctatus, but 1 patient had normal fundi. Autofluorescence imaging revealed an association between the white dots and the hyperautofluorescent foci in younger subjects. The overall autofluorescence signal appeared low in all patients. The SD-OCT changes included deposits associated with the white dots that extended from Bruch's membrane to the external limiting membrane and focal loss of outer segments. Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) performed after standard dark adaptation showed moderate to severe generalized rod system dysfunction. Dim flash rod system ERGs were undetectable (N = 3) or subnormal (N = 6), but normalized after prolonged dark adaptation in 7 cases. Scotopic bright flash ERGs contained a reduced b:a ratio ("negative" ERG) in most cases; the use of a red stimulus under dark adaptation and extended recordings in the dark-adapted state in 1 patient identified dark-adapted cones as the probable source of the ERG signals. Photopic responses were abnormal in 6 of 9 cases. Conclusions The clinical and electrophysiologic phenotype of patients with RDH5 retinopathy is variable. Mutations in RDH5 lead to reduced autofluorescence signal possibly because of absence of retinoid-derived fluorophores. The dark-adapted bright flash ERG is often electronegative and likely a manifestation of the dark-adapted cone system exposed in the absence of normal rod function. Financial disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Around 30% of patients with fundus albipunctatus, usually elderly, develop progressive cone dystrophy.

    “Around 30% of patients with fundus albipunctatus, usually elderly, develop also progressive cone dystrophy [139,144].”

    From The Role of Vitamin A in Retinal Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [139]

  • Impaired 11-cis-retinal production leads to decreased A2E and lipofuscin formation, resulting in reduced autofluorescence in FAF images.

    “Impaired 11-cis-retinal production also leads to decreased A2E and lipofuscin formation, which results in reduced autofluorescence in FAF images [87,89,139,140,141].”

    From The Role of Vitamin A in Retinal Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [139]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 109

Authors
Sergouniotis, P. I., Sohn, E. H., Li, Z., McBain, V. A., Wright, G. A., Moore, A. T., Robson, A. G., Holder, G. E., & Webster, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital (GB)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Tongji Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Webster, Andrew R.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
118
Issue
8
Pages
1661-1670
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042703342
Cited by
109
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Keywords
fundus albipunctatus, phenotypic variability, novel mutations, night blindness, rod photoreceptor dysfunction, fundus autofluorescence, genotype-phenotype correlation, autosomal recessive retinal degeneration, photopic ERG
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Oxidoreductases, Child, Dark Adaptation, DNA Mutational Analysis, Electroretinography, Female, Fluorescein Angiography, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Night Blindness, Phenotype, Retinal Degeneration, Retrospective Studies, Visual Acuity, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review