Phenotypic Variability in RDH5 Retinopathy (Fundus Albipunctatus)
Abstract
Purpose To describe phenotypic variability and report novel mutational data in patients with mutation in RDH5 (fundus albipunctatus). Design Retrospective case series. Participants Nine patients from 8 families (aged 7-55 years) with night blindness and electrophysiologic or fundoscopic findings in keeping with RDH5 mutation were ascertained. Methods Detailed ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and electrophysiologic assessment were performed. The coding region and intron-exon boundaries of RDH5 were analyzed. Main outcome measures RDH5 mutation status and resultant clinical and functional characteristics. Results Eleven mutations in RDH5 were detected in the 8 families in the study, with 9 of these changes being novel. Visual acuity was normal in all but 1 eye of a patient with adult-onset central visual loss. Most patients had white dots extending into the mid-periphery on fundus examination, consistent with fundus albipunctatus, but 1 patient had normal fundi. Autofluorescence imaging revealed an association between the white dots and the hyperautofluorescent foci in younger subjects. The overall autofluorescence signal appeared low in all patients. The SD-OCT changes included deposits associated with the white dots that extended from Bruch's membrane to the external limiting membrane and focal loss of outer segments. Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) performed after standard dark adaptation showed moderate to severe generalized rod system dysfunction. Dim flash rod system ERGs were undetectable (N = 3) or subnormal (N = 6), but normalized after prolonged dark adaptation in 7 cases. Scotopic bright flash ERGs contained a reduced b:a ratio ("negative" ERG) in most cases; the use of a red stimulus under dark adaptation and extended recordings in the dark-adapted state in 1 patient identified dark-adapted cones as the probable source of the ERG signals. Photopic responses were abnormal in 6 of 9 cases. Conclusions The clinical and electrophysiologic phenotype of patients with RDH5 retinopathy is variable. Mutations in RDH5 lead to reduced autofluorescence signal possibly because of absence of retinoid-derived fluorophores. The dark-adapted bright flash ERG is often electronegative and likely a manifestation of the dark-adapted cone system exposed in the absence of normal rod function. Financial disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Around 30% of patients with fundus albipunctatus, usually elderly, develop progressive cone dystrophy.
“Around 30% of patients with fundus albipunctatus, usually elderly, develop also progressive cone dystrophy [139,144].”
From The Role of Vitamin A in Retinal Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [139]
Impaired 11-cis-retinal production leads to decreased A2E and lipofuscin formation, resulting in reduced autofluorescence in FAF images.
“Impaired 11-cis-retinal production also leads to decreased A2E and lipofuscin formation, which results in reduced autofluorescence in FAF images [87,89,139,140,141].”
From The Role of Vitamin A in Retinal Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [139]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Sergouniotis, P. I., Sohn, E. H., Li, Z., McBain, V. A., Wright, G. A., Moore, A. T., Robson, A. G., Holder, G. E., & Webster, A. R.
- Affiliations
- Moorfields Eye Hospital (GB)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Tongji Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Webster, Andrew R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1661-1670
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042703342
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Keywords
- fundus albipunctatus, phenotypic variability, novel mutations, night blindness, rod photoreceptor dysfunction, fundus autofluorescence, genotype-phenotype correlation, autosomal recessive retinal degeneration, photopic ERG
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Oxidoreductases, Child, Dark Adaptation, DNA Mutational Analysis, Electroretinography, Female, Fluorescein Angiography, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Night Blindness, Phenotype, Retinal Degeneration, Retrospective Studies, Visual Acuity, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review