Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expanded 2-Year Follow-up of Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema

Open access
Elman, Michael J., Bressler, Neil M., Qin, Haijing, Beck, Roy W., Ferris, Frederick L., Friedman, Scott M., Glassman, Adam R., Scott, Ingrid U., Stockdale, Cynthia R., Sun, Jennifer K.·2011·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective To report expanded 2-year follow up of a previously reported randomized trial evaluating intravitreal 0.5-mg ranibizumab or 4-mg triamcinolone combined with focal/grid laser compared with focal/grid laser alone for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Design Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Participants Eight hundred and fifty four study eyes of 691 participants with visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320 (approximate Snellen equivalent) and DME involving the fovea. Methods Continuation of procedures previously reported for the randomized trial. Main Outcome Measures Best-corrected visual acuity and safety at the 2-year visit. Results At the 2-year visit, compared with the sham plus prompt laser group, the mean change in the visual acuity letter score from baseline was 3.7 letters greater in the ranibizumab plus prompt laser group (95% confidence interval adjusted for multiple comparisons [aCI]: -0.4 to +7.7) l, 5.8 letters greater in the ranibizumab plus deferred laser group (95% aCI: +1.9 to +9.8) and 1.5 letters worse in the triamcinolone plus prompt laser group (95% aCI : -5.5 to +2.4). After the 1- through the 2-year visit in the ranibizumab with prompt or deferred laser groups, the median numbers of injections were 2 and 3 (potential maximum of 13), respectively. At the 2-year visit, the percentages of eyes with central subfield thickness ≥250 μm were 59% in the sham + prompt laser group, 43% in the ranibizumab + prompt laser group, 42% in the ranibizumab + deferred laser group, and 52% in the triamcinolone + prompt laser group. No systemic events attributable to study treatment were apparent. Three eyes in 3 (0.8%) of 375 participants had injection-related endophthalmitis in the ranibizumab groups while elevated intraocular pressure and cataract surgery were more frequent in the triamcinolone+prompt laser group. Conclusions The expanded 2-year results reported herein are similar to results published previously and reinforce the conclusions originally reported, that ranibizumab should be considered for patients with DME and characteristics similar to the cohort in this clinical trial, including vision impairment with DME involving the center of the macula.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.033

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 573

Metadata

Authors
Elman, M. J., Bressler, N. M., Qin, H., Beck, R. W., Ferris, F. L., Friedman, S. M., Glassman, A. R., Scott, I. U., Stockdale, C. R., & Sun, J. K.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
118
Issue
4
Pages
609-614
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982179488
Cited by
573
References
4
FWCI
48.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expanded 2-Year Follow-up of Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.033
The paper
Elman, M. J., Bressler, N. M., Qin, H., Beck, R. W., Ferris, F. L., Friedman, S. M., Glassman, A. R., Scott, I. U., Stockdale, C. R., & Sun, J. K. (2011). Expanded 2-Year Follow-up of Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.