A 4-Year Longitudinal Study of 555 Patients Treated with Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Open accessAbstract
Objective To investigate the visual outcome, pattern of discontinuation, ocular complications, and mortality of patients treated with a variable ranibizumab dosing regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) for 4 years.Design Retrospective chart review supplemented with clinical examination.Participants Six hundred eyes of 555 patients initiated intravitreal treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition for neovascular AMD in 2007 in a community-based hospital.Methods Patient data from a database were retrieved from 2007 through 2011. Descriptive evaluation of the main outcome measures was carried out for the cohort of patients. A group of patients who had been discontinued because of apparent disease inactivity was reexamined.Main outcome measures Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Snellen), number of intravitreal injections, causes of discontinuations, ocular complications, and standardized mortality rate.Results One hundred ninety-two eyes (32%) were still receiving active treatment after 4 years. The mean BCVA in the 192 eyes was unchanged from the start (baseline, 0.30; 4-year follow-up, 0.32; P>0.3). Visual acuity after the third loading dose was associated significantly with the outcome (P<0.0001) and was a better predictor than baseline acuity. The mean number of injections was 5.5 per year. For 408 eyes (68%), discontinuation of treatment was motivated by the following 4 reasons: lack of apparent treatment response (28%), failure to appear at follow-up (11%), death (9%), and disease inactivity (20%, 120 eyes). Treatment was resumed later in 18% of patients discontinued because of inactivity. Sixty-seven eyes were reexamined in 2012 from the group of patients with disease inactivity. The final visual acuity by then had decreased significantly from the time of discontinuation, from 0.38 to 0.15 (P = 0.001). Endophthalmitis occurred in 2 eyes of 7584 injections. A total of 125 patients had died, corresponding to 75% of the mean mortality in the community.Conclusions One third of the eyes were still receiving active treatment after 4 years and had stable visual acuity. One third of fellow eyes (eyes at risk) started treatment during the 4 years. One fifth of discontinued eyes resumed treatment, indicating that close follow-up should be maintained for patients discontinued because of disease inactivity. The ocular complication rate was 0.2%, and the mortality rate was below expected.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient expectations are influenced by fellow-eye status, the duration of treatment, and the burden of multiple attendances, investigations, and invasive treatment delivery.
“Patient expectations are influenced by fellow-eye status, the longevity of the course of treatment and the consequential burden of multiple attendances, investigations and invasive treatment delivery.5,6”
From Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMD (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
The Visual Acuity section reports that some patients stopped attending because of trouble with transportation and monthly visits or a lack of trust in treatment. This supports a link between repeated visits and willingness to continue, but the paper does not establish that fellow-eye status, treatment duration, investigations, or invasive delivery influenced patient expectations. The Fellow-Eye Choroidal Neovascularization section reports fellow-eye outcomes, not expectations (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPatient expectations of successful treatment differ among patients, carers, and clinicians.
“The expectations of patients, carers and clinicians on what constitutes successful treatment are different.”
From Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMD (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
The Visual Acuity section describes why some patients stopped treatment, and the Discussion describes a clinical threshold for discontinuation. Neither compares what patients, carers, and clinicians consider successful treatment. Searches for differing expectations and perceptions of treatment success found no such comparison in our copy; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMultiple large retrospective or registry studies have published 4- and 5-year results.
“Several large-scale retrospective or registry studies have reported 4- and 5-year outcomes”
From Five-Year Outcomes with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
In an Australian retrospective review, patients frequently stop attending care shortly after their vision declines.
“patients who stop returning for care often do so soon after losing vision”
From Five-Year Outcomes with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Patients with better vision are over-represented in retrospective/registry studies of long-term anti-VEGF outcomes.
“so that patients with better vision are over-represented in these studies.”
From Five-Year Outcomes with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 116
- Authors
- Rasmussen, A., Bloch, S. B., Fuchs, J., Hansen, L. H., Larsen, M., LaCour, M., Lund-Andersen, H., & Sander, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Glostrup Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Rasmussen, Annette
- ORCID
- Larsen, Michael
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2630-2636
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011187017
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The VELUX Foundation
- The Lundbeck Foundation
- Glostrup Hospital
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Keywords
- ranibizumab, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, anti-VEGF therapy, intravitreal injection, treatment discontinuation, visual acuity outcomes, endophthalmitis, ocular complications, mortality, predictors of treatment response, long-term follow-up, retreatment
- MeSH terms
- Ranibizumab, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hospitals, Community, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Visual Acuity, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Retreatment, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Withholding Treatment, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Wet Macular Degeneration, Intravitreal Injections, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review