Cited by 110Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeOcular Infections and TreatmentsDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity

A randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious uveitis

Open access
Rathinam, Sivakumar R., Babu, Manohar, Thundikandy, Radhika, Kanakath, Anuradha, Nardone, Natalie, Esterberg, Elizabeth, Lee, Salena M., Enanoria, Wayne T.A. +4 more·2014·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective To compare the relative effectiveness of methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis.Design Multicenter, block-randomized, observer-masked clinical trial.Participants Eighty patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing therapy at Aravind Eye Hospitals in Madurai and Coimbatore, India.Intervention Patients were randomized to receive 25 mg weekly oral methotrexate or 1 g twice daily oral mycophenolate mofetil and were monitored monthly for 6 months. Oral prednisone and topical corticosteroids were tapered.Main outcome measures Masked examiners assessed the primary outcome of treatment success, defined by achieving the following at 5 and 6 months: (1) ≤0.5+ anterior chamber cells, ≤0.5+ vitreous cells, ≤0.5+ vitreous haze and no active retinal/choroidal lesions in both eyes, (2) ≤10 mg of prednisone and ≤2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1% a day, and (3) no declaration of treatment failure because of intolerability or safety. Additional outcomes included time to sustained corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation, change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, resolution of macular edema, adverse events, subgroup analysis by anatomic location, and medication adherence.Results Forty-one patients were randomized to methotrexate and 39 to mycophenolate mofetil. A total of 67 patients (35 methotrexate, 32 mycophenolate mofetil) contributed to the primary outcome. Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved treatment success with methotrexate and 47% with mycophenolate mofetil (P = 0.09). Treatment failure from adverse events or tolerability was not different by treatment arm (P = 0.99). There were no differences between treatment groups in time to corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation (P = 0.44), change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.68), or resolution of macular edema (P = 0.31).Conclusions There was no statistically significant difference in corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation between patients receiving methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. However, there was a 22% difference in treatment success favoring methotrexate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.023

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 110

Authors
Rathinam, S. R., Babu, M., Thundikandy, R., Kanakath, A., Nardone, N., Esterberg, E., Lee, S. M., Enanoria, W. T. A., Porco, T. C., Browne, E. N., Weinrib, R., & Acharya, N. R.
Affiliations
  • Aravind Eye Hospital (IN)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Acharya, Nisha R.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
121
Issue
10
Pages
1863-1870
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973387000
Cited by
110
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7
FWCI
10.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (EY 002162, P30EY002162, U10EY021125)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Keywords
non-infectious uveitis, intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, panuveitis, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, steroid-sparing therapy, immunosuppressive therapy, treatment success, macular edema, adverse events, medication adherence, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Macular Edema, Male, Methotrexate, Middle Aged, Mycophenolic Acid, Uveitis, Visual Acuity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review