Long-term outcomes of treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To analyze the long-term outcomes of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) starting treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors at least 5 years earlier.Design Database observational study.Participants Treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular AMD tracked by the Fight Retinal Blindness outcome registry that received at least 1 anti-VEGF injection.Methods Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curves were used to display visual acuity (VA) results.Main outcome measures Change in mean VA and number of injections and visits from baseline up to 7 years after initiating treatment.Results The mean follow-up time of all 1212 identified eyes was 53.5 months, and 549 (45%) continued attending after 60 months. Mean VA improved from 55.1 to 61.4 letters after 6 months and remained above the mean presenting VA for approximately 6 years. After 7 years, mean VA was 2.6 letters lower than baseline for the 131 eyes still being followed; 40% had VA ≥70 (20/40) letters, and 18% had VA ≤35 letters (20/200). Of those with 20/40 VA before treatment, 40% had lost it after 7 years. Geographic atrophy affecting the fovea was thought to be the cause of a ≥10-letter loss after 6.5 years in 37% of a subset of such eyes that were retrospectively analyzed. A median of 6 injections and 9 visits were recorded over the first 12 months, and then 5 treatments and 7 to 9 visits per annum thereafter through 7 years. Treatment was discontinued for 663 eyes (53%) within the first 5 years. Despite initial gains in vision, the mean VA of these eyes had deteriorated to baseline or worse around the time treatment was discontinued. The rate of serious adverse events was low.Conclusions Good long-term outcomes of VEGF inhibition for neovascular AMD were found in this study. These results may be better than other reports because more injections were given to our patients, possibly associated with a greater incentive for the physician to treat. Further studies to determine how to maximize the proportion of eyes that retain the initial VA gains of anti-VEGF are warranted.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an Australian retrospective review, patients frequently stop attending care shortly after their vision declines.
“patients who stop returning for care often do so soon after losing vision”
From Five-Year Outcomes with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
Multiple large retrospective or registry studies have published 4- and 5-year results.
“Several large-scale retrospective or registry studies have reported 4- and 5-year outcomes”
From Five-Year Outcomes with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
Patients with better vision are over-represented in retrospective/registry studies of long-term anti-VEGF outcomes.
“so that patients with better vision are over-represented in these studies.”
From Five-Year Outcomes with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
In the Australian retrospective review, patients received a mean of 25 injections over 5 years, and mean visual acuity fell to 20/63.
“In the Australian retrospective review, the mean number of injections over 5 years was 25 with mean visual acuity decreasing to 20/63.20”
From Five-Year Outcomes with Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2016) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 254
- Authors
- Gillies, M. C., Campain, A., Barthelmes, D., Simpson, J. M., Arnold, J. J., Guymer, R. H., McAllister, I. L., Essex, R. W., Morlet, N., & Hunyor, A. P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Lions Eye Institute (AU)
- Australian National University (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Barthelmes, Daniel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1837-1845
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W633153563
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 18.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ögonfonden
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (632663)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Keywords
- neovascular age-related macular degeneration, anti-VEGF therapy, geographic atrophy, treatment discontinuation, intravitreal injection, visual acuity loss, medication adherence
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Registries, Visual Acuity, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Retreatment, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Wet Macular Degeneration, Intravitreal Injections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review