Cited by 254Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal and Macular SurgeryOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome

Long-term outcomes of treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Open access
Gillies, Mark C., Campain, Anna, Barthelmes, Daniel, Simpson, Judy M., Arnold, Jennifer J., Guymer, Robyn H., McAllister, Ian L., Essex, Rohan W. +2 more·2015·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose To analyze the long-term outcomes of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) starting treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors at least 5 years earlier.Design Database observational study.Participants Treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular AMD tracked by the Fight Retinal Blindness outcome registry that received at least 1 anti-VEGF injection.Methods Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curves were used to display visual acuity (VA) results.Main outcome measures Change in mean VA and number of injections and visits from baseline up to 7 years after initiating treatment.Results The mean follow-up time of all 1212 identified eyes was 53.5 months, and 549 (45%) continued attending after 60 months. Mean VA improved from 55.1 to 61.4 letters after 6 months and remained above the mean presenting VA for approximately 6 years. After 7 years, mean VA was 2.6 letters lower than baseline for the 131 eyes still being followed; 40% had VA ≥70 (20/40) letters, and 18% had VA ≤35 letters (20/200). Of those with 20/40 VA before treatment, 40% had lost it after 7 years. Geographic atrophy affecting the fovea was thought to be the cause of a ≥10-letter loss after 6.5 years in 37% of a subset of such eyes that were retrospectively analyzed. A median of 6 injections and 9 visits were recorded over the first 12 months, and then 5 treatments and 7 to 9 visits per annum thereafter through 7 years. Treatment was discontinued for 663 eyes (53%) within the first 5 years. Despite initial gains in vision, the mean VA of these eyes had deteriorated to baseline or worse around the time treatment was discontinued. The rate of serious adverse events was low.Conclusions Good long-term outcomes of VEGF inhibition for neovascular AMD were found in this study. These results may be better than other reports because more injections were given to our patients, possibly associated with a greater incentive for the physician to treat. Further studies to determine how to maximize the proportion of eyes that retain the initial VA gains of anti-VEGF are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 254

Authors
Gillies, M. C., Campain, A., Barthelmes, D., Simpson, J. M., Arnold, J. J., Guymer, R. H., McAllister, I. L., Essex, R. W., Morlet, N., & Hunyor, A. P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Lions Eye Institute (AU)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Barthelmes, Daniel
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
122
Issue
9
Pages
1837-1845
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W633153563
Cited by
254
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14
FWCI
18.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ögonfonden
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (632663)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Keywords
neovascular age-related macular degeneration, anti-VEGF therapy, geographic atrophy, treatment discontinuation, intravitreal injection, visual acuity loss, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Registries, Visual Acuity, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Retreatment, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Wet Macular Degeneration, Intravitreal Injections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review