Clinical and Morphologic Characteristics of MEK Inhibitor–Associated Retinopathy
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To investigate the clinical and morphologic characteristics of serous retinal disturbances in patients taking mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors.Participants A total of 313 fluid foci in 50 eyes of 25 patients receiving MEK inhibitors for treatment of their metastatic cancer, who had evidence of serous retinal detachments confirmed by optical coherence tomography (OCT).Design Single-center, retrospective cohort study.Methods Clinical examination and OCT were used to evaluate MEK inhibitor-associated subretinal fluid. The morphology, distribution, and location of fluid foci were serially evaluated for each eye. Choroidal thickness was measured at each time point (baseline, fluid accumulation, and fluid resolution). Two independent observers performed all measurements. Statistical analysis was used to correlate interobserver findings and compare choroidal thickness and visual acuity at each time point.Main outcome measures Comparison of OCT characteristics of retinal abnormalities at baseline to fluid accumulation.Results The majority of patients had fluid foci that were bilateral (92%) and multifocal (77%) and at least 1 focus involving the fovea (83.3%). All fluid foci occurred between the interdigitation zone and an intact retinal pigment epithelium. The 313 fluid foci were classified into 4 morphologies, as follows: 231 (73.8%) dome, 36 (11.5%) caterpillar, 31 (9.9%) wavy, and 15 (4.8%) splitting. Best-corrected visual acuity at fluid resolution was not statistically different from baseline; and no eye lost more than 2 Snellen lines from baseline at the time of fluid accumulation. There was no statistical difference in the choroidal thickness between the different time points (baseline, fluid accumulation, and fluid resolution). A strong positive interobserver correlation was obtained for choroidal thickness measurements (r = 0.97, P < 0.0001) and grading of foci morphology (r = 0.97, P < 0.0001).Conclusion The subretinal fluid foci associated with MEK inhibitors have unique clinical and morphologic characteristics, which can be distinguished from the findings of central serous chorioretinopathy. In this series, MEK inhibitors did not cause irreversible loss of vision or serious eye damage.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The clinical characteristics of MEKAR include the development of serous detachments of the neurosensory retina.
“The clinical characteristics of MEKAR include the development of serous detachments of the neurosensory retina.”
From MAPK Pathways in Ocular Pathophysiology: Potential Therapeutic Drugs and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [216]
MEKAR fluid foci are central serous retinopathy-like but with distinct characteristics such as more commonly being bilateral (92%), multifocal (77% with a median of 6 foci), having both a macular and foveal localization, and a layer depth strictly between the RPE and the interdigitation zone.
“These fluid foci are central serous retinopathy (CSR)-like, but with distinct characteristics such as more commonly being bilateral (92%), multifocal (77% with a median of 6 foci), having both a macular and foveal localization, and a layer depth strictly between the RPE and the interdigitation zone [ 216 ]”
From MAPK Pathways in Ocular Pathophysiology: Potential Therapeutic Drugs and Challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [216]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 141
- Authors
- Francis, J. H., Habib, L. A., Abramson, D. H., Yannuzzi, L. A., Heinemann, M., Gounder, M. M., Grisham, R. N., Postow, M. A., Shoushtari, A. N., Chi, P., Segal, N. H., Yaeger, R., Ho, A. L., Chapman, P. B., & Catalanotti, F.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Francis, Jasmine H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1788-1798
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5698142
- OpenAlex
- W2735369042
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Oncology and Treatments
- Keywords
- MEK inhibitors, retinal toxicity, serous retinal detachment, choroidal thickness, central serous chorioretinopathy, metastatic cancer, visual acuity, interobserver agreement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Azetidines, Benzimidazoles, Female, Fluorescein Angiography, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Piperidines, Pyridones, Pyrimidinones, Retinal Detachment, Retrospective Studies, Visual Acuity, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Young Adult, Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, Subretinal Fluid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review