Cited by 84

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interference of two photons of different color

Raymer, M.G., van Enk, S.J., McKinstrie, C.J., McGuinness, H.J.·2010·Optics Communications

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.optcom.2009.10.057

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 3-dimensional QOCT image of onion-skin tissue coated with gold nanoparticles indicates a resolution of 1 μm.

    “An example of a 3-dimensional image taken via QOCT for the skin of an onion coated in gold is shown in Fig. 3; this result indicates a resolution of 1 µm.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

    The paper’s Conclusions discuss interference between photons of different colors and frequency conversion, not QOCT imaging. Searches for QOCT, onion skin, gold nanoparticles, and a 1 µm imaging resolution found no passage addressing the claimed image or resolution. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Blow, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 42, 4102, 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.4102 · DOI
  2. Louisell, 1961, Phys. Rev., 124, 1646, 10.1103/PhysRev.124.1646 · DOI
  3. VanDevender, 2004, J. Mod. Opt., 51, 1433, 10.1080/09500340408235283 · DOI
  4. Albota, 2004, Opt. Lett., 29, 1449, 10.1364/OL.29.001449 · DOI
  5. Roussev, 2004, Opt. Lett., 29, 1518, 10.1364/OL.29.001518 · DOI
  6. McKinstrie, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 5037, 10.1364/OPEX.12.005037 · DOI
  7. McKinstrie, 2005, Opt. Express, 13, 9131, 10.1364/OPEX.13.009131 · DOI
  8. Gnauck, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 8989, 10.1364/OE.14.008989 · DOI
  9. Méchin, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 8995, 10.1364/OE.14.008995 · DOI
  10. Rodionov, 2004, JETP Lett., 79, 10.1134/1.1787108 · DOI
  11. Ferraro, 2004, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 21, 1241, 10.1364/JOSAB.21.001241 · DOI
  12. Pfister, 2004, Phys. Rev. A, 70, 020302, 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.020302 · DOI
  13. McKinstrie, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 2720, 10.1364/OE.16.002720 · DOI
  14. Ekert, 1995, Am. J. Phys., 63, 415, 10.1119/1.17904 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Law, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 5304, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5304 · DOI
  16. Wasilewski, 2006, Phys. Rev. A, 73, 063816, 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.063816 · DOI
  17. McKinstrie, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 8072, 10.1364/OE.14.008072 · DOI
  18. Bloch, 1962, Nucl. Phys., 39, 95, 10.1016/0029-5582(62)90377-2 · DOI
  19. Braunstein, 2005, Phys. Rev. A, 71, 055801, 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.055801 · DOI
  20. McKinstrie, 2009, Opt. Commun., 282, 583, 10.1016/j.optcom.2008.10.037 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raymer, M. G., van Enk, S. J., McKinstrie, C. J., & McGuinness, H. J.
Venue
Optics Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
283
Issue
5
Pages
747-752
ISSN
0030-4018
Cited by
84
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review