Review of STAT3 (Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription) in head and neck cancer
Abstract
STATs can be activated independently of JAKs, most notably by c-Src kinases. In cancer cells, STAT3 and STAT5 activation leads to the increased expression of downstream target genes, leading to increased cell proliferation, cell survival, angiogenesis, and immune system evasion. STAT3 and STAT5 are expressed and activated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma where they contribute to cell survival and proliferation. STATs can be activated by a number of signal transduction pathways, including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), nicotinic receptor, interleukin (IL) receptor, and erythropoietin receptor pathways. Identifying agents that inhibit STAT-3, a cytosolic transcription factor involved in the activation of various genes implicated in tumor progression is a promising strategy for cancer chemoprevention. Several approaches have been used to inhibit STAT3 in the hope of developing an antitumor agent. Although several STAT3-specific agents are promising, none are in clinical development, mostly because of drug delivery and stability issues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aberrant activation of STAT3 is associated with the etiology and progression of a variety of malignant epithelial-derived tumors, including HNSCC and CRC.
“The aberrant activation of STAT3 is associated with the etiology and progression in a variety of malignant epithelial-derived tumors, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).”
From Small-molecule PROTAC mediates targeted protein degradation to treat STAT3-dependent epithelial cancer (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dong, J., Cheng, X.-D., Zhang, W.-D., & Qin, J.-J. (2021) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00629 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Rah, B., Rather, R. A., Bhat, G. R., Baba, A. B., Mushtaq, I., Farooq, M., Yousuf, T., Dar, S. B., Parveen, S., Hassan, R., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.821344 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Jin, J., Wu, Y., Zhao, Z., Wu, Y., Zhou, Y.-D., Liu, S., Sun, Q., Yang, G., Lin, J., Nagle, D. G., et al. (2022) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.160606 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“In contrast to the transient mode of action in normal cells, STAT3 exhibits persistent aberrant activation in a variety of malignant epithelial-derived tumors (2).”
- Authors
- Mali, S. B.
- Corresponding author
- Mali, Shrikant Balasaheb
- Venue
- Oral Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 565-569
- ISSN
- 1368-8375 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080738413
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2025-10-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oral Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Keywords
- STAT3, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, STAT5, c-Src kinase, epidermal growth factor receptor, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, interleukin receptors, erythropoietin receptor, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, immune evasion, chemoprevention, STAT3 inhibitor, drug delivery
- MeSH terms
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Receptors, Nicotinic, Signal Transduction, Receptors, Erythropoietin, Receptors, Interleukin, STAT3 Transcription Factor, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review