Relationship of weight status, physical activity and screen time with academic achievement in adolescents
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of weight status, physical activity and screen time with academic achievement in Chilean adolescents.Methods The present cross-sectional study included 395 adolescents. The International Obesity Task Force cut-off points were used to define the weight status. Physical activity was assessed using the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents and screen time was assessed using several questions about television, videogame and computer use. Academic achievement was measured using the mean of the grades obtained in mathematics and language subjects.Results In both genders, adolescents with obesity and excessive screen time earned worse grades compared to their non-obese peers and their peers that complied with screen time recommendations. The logistic regression analysis showed that adolescents with obesity, classified with medium-low physical activity and excessive screen time recommendations (excess ≥2h/day) are less likely to obtain high academic achievement (boys: OR=0.26; girls: OR=0.23) compared to their non-obese peers, high levels of physical activity and those who comply with the current screen time recommendations. Similar results were observed in adolescents with obesity and classified with medium-low physical activity (boys: OR=0.46; girls: OR=0.33) or excessive screen time (boys: OR=0.35; girls: OR=0.36) compared to adolescents with high levels of physical activity and those who complied with the screen time recommendations, respectively.Conclusion This study shows that when combined, obesity, low-medium levels of physical activity and excessive screen time might be related to poor academic achievement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Screen use for more than 2 h per day may be negatively associated with academic performance.
“The use of screens for a daily duration of more than 2 h may be negatively associated with academic performance [17,18,19].”
From Lifestyle Habits Predict Academic Performance in High School Students: The Adolescent Student Academic Performance Longitudinal Study (ASAP) (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- García-Hermoso, A., & Marina, R.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL)
- Venue
- Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-50
- ISSN
- 1871-403X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1156376823
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obesity Research & Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- adolescent obesity, academic performance, physical activity, screen time, sedentary behavior, mathematics grades, Chilean adolescents, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Body Weight, Child, Child Behavior, Chile, Computers, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Mathematics, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Television, Exercise, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Video Games, Sedentary Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review