Cited by 20Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsDrug-Induced Ocular ToxicityAcute Kidney Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Similar Risk of Kidney Failure among Patients with Blinding Diseases Who Receive Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, and Bevacizumab

Open access

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize the incidence of kidney failure associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF exposure; and compare the risk of kidney failure in patients treated with ranibizumab, aflibercept, or bevacizumab. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study across 12 databases in the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) network. SUBJECTS: Subjects aged ≥ 18 years with ≥ 3 monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF medications for a blinding disease (diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, exudative age-related macular degeneration, or retinal vein occlusion). METHODS: The standardized incidence proportions and rates of kidney failure while on treatment with anti-VEGF were calculated. For each comparison (e.g., aflibercept versus ranibizumab), patients from each group were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of kidney failure while on treatment. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to combine each database's hazard ratio (HR) estimate into a single network-wide estimate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of kidney failure while on anti-VEGF treatment, and time from cohort entry to kidney failure. RESULTS: Of the 6.1 million patients with blinding diseases, 37 189 who received ranibizumab, 39 447 aflibercept, and 163 611 bevacizumab were included; the total treatment exposure time was 161 724 person-years. The average standardized incidence proportion of kidney failure was 678 per 100 000 persons (range, 0-2389), and incidence rate 742 per 100 000 person-years (range, 0-2661). The meta-analysis HR of kidney failure comparing aflibercept with ranibizumab was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.47; P = 0.45), ranibizumab with bevacizumab 0.95 (95% CI, 0.68-1.32; P = 0.62), and aflibercept with bevacizumab 0.95 (95% CI, 0.65-1.39; P = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: There was no substantially different relative risk of kidney failure between those who received ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or aflibercept. Practicing ophthalmologists and nephrologists should be aware of the risk of kidney failure among patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF medications and that there is little empirical evidence to preferentially choose among the specific intravitreal anti-VEGF agents. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.oret.2024.03.014

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The OHDSI network and its open-source analytic tools have been previously used to generate reliable evidence in medicine, including ophthalmology.

    “The OHDSI network and its open-source analytic tools have been previously used to generate reliable evidence in medicine, including ophthalmology.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 2021, Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study, Lancet Glob Health, 9, e144, 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Martin, 2018, Evolution of intravitreal therapy for retinal diseases-from CMV to CNV: the LXXIV Edward Jackson memorial lecture, Am J Ophthalmol, 191, xli, 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.12.019 · DOI
  3. Hanna, 2019, Nephrotoxicity induced by intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: emerging evidence, Kidney Int, 96, 572, 10.1016/j.kint.2019.02.042 · DOI
  4. Gurevich, 2009, Renal effects of anti-angiogenesis therapy: update for the internist, Am J Med, 122, 322, 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.11.025 · DOI
  5. Izzedine, 2014, Kidney diseases associated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF): an 8-year observational study at a single center, Medicine, 93, 333, 10.1097/MD.0000000000000207 · DOI
  6. Iseki, 2003, Proteinuria and the risk of developing end-stage renal disease, Kidney Int, 63, 1468, 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00868.x · DOI
  7. Hemmelgarn, 2010, Relation between kidney function, proteinuria, and adverse outcomes, JAMA, 303, 423, 10.1001/jama.2010.39 · DOI
  8. Hsu, 2020, Post-acute kidney injury proteinuria and subsequent kidney disease progression: the Assessment, Serial Evaluation, and Subsequent Sequelae in Acute Kidney Injury (ASSESS-AKI) study, JAMA Intern Med, 180, 402, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6390 · DOI
  9. Jiang, 2023, Do intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents lead to renal adverse events? A pharmacovigilance real-world study, Front Med, 10, 10.3389/fmed.2023.1100397 · DOI
  10. Avery, 2017, Systematic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravitreal aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab, Retina, 37, 1847, 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001493 · DOI
  11. Avery, 2014, Systemic pharmacokinetics following intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, bevacizumab or aflibercept in patients with neovascular AMD, Br J Ophthalmol, 98, 1636, 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305252 · DOI
  12. Phadke, 2021, Review of intravitreal VEGF inhibitor toxicity and report of collapsing FSGS with TMA in a patient with age-related macular degeneration, Clin Kidney J, 14, 2158, 10.1093/ckj/sfab066 · DOI
  13. Zafar, 2023, Systemic adverse events among patients with diabetes treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections, JAMA Ophthalmol, 141, 658, 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.2098 · DOI
  14. Kameda, 2018, Renal function after intravitreal administration of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease, J Diabetes Investig, 9, 937, 10.1111/jdi.12771 · DOI
  15. O’Neill, 2019, Evaluation of long-term intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections on renal function in patients with and without diabetic kidney disease, BMC Nephrol, 20, 478, 10.1186/s12882-019-1650-1 · DOI
  16. Lees, 2023, A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of intravitreal VEGF inhibitors on cardiorenal outcomes, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 38, 1666, 10.1093/ndt/gfac305 · DOI
  17. Tsao YC, Chen TY, Wang LA, et al. Acute kidney injury from intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BioDrugs;37:843–854. · DOI
  18. Hanna, 2019, Three patients with injection of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and subsequent exacerbation of chronic proteinuria and hypertension, Clin Kidney J, 12, 92, 10.1093/ckj/sfy060 · DOI
  19. Wells, 2015, Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema, N Engl J Med, 372, 1193, 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264 · DOI
  20. Glassman, 2018, Changes in blood pressure and urine albumin-creatine ratio in a randomized clinical trial comparing aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for diabetic maculara edema, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 59, 10.1167/iovs.17-22853 · DOI
  21. Overhage, 2012, Validation of a common data model for active safety surveillance research, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 19, 54, 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000376 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ostropolets, 2022, Phenotyping in distributed data networks: selecting the right codes for the right patients, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2022, 826
  23. Aiello, 2011, Rationale for the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research network treatment protocol for center-involved diabetic macular edema, Ophthalmology, 118, e5, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.058 · DOI
  24. Levey, 2020, Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) consensus conference, Kidney Int, 97, 1117, 10.1016/j.kint.2020.02.010 · DOI
  25. 2013, KDIGO 2012 Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease, Kidney Int Suppl, 3, 1
  26. Ostropolets, 2020, Adapting electronic health records-derived phenotypes to claims data: lessons learned in using limited clinical data for phenotyping, J Biomed Inform, 102, 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103363 · DOI
  27. Swerdel, 2019, PheValuator: development and evaluation of a phenotype algorithm evaluator, J Biomed Inform, 97, 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103258 · DOI
  28. Suchard, 2013, Massive parallelization of serial inference algorithms for a complex generalized linear model, ACM Trans Model Comput Simul, 23, 10.1145/2414416.2414791 · DOI
  29. Glasheen, 2017, Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI)-update and ICD-10 translation, J Diabetes Complications, 31, 1007, 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.02.018 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Romano, 1993, Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives, J Clin Epidemiol, 46, 1075, 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90103-8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Austin, 2009, Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples, Stat Med, 28, 3083, 10.1002/sim.3697 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Suchard, 2019, Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis, Lancet, 394, 1816, 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32317-7 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Tian, 2018, Evaluating large-scale propensity score performance through real-world and synthetic data experiments, Int J Epidemiol, 47, 2005, 10.1093/ije/dyy120 · DOI
  34. Zhang, 2022, Adjusting for indirectly measured confounding using large-scale propensity score, J Biomed Inform, 134, 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104204 · DOI
  35. Schuemie, 2022, Combining cox regressions across a heterogeneous distributed research network facing small and zero counts, Stat Methods Med Res, 31, 438, 10.1177/09622802211060518 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Levey, 2007, Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: approaches and initiatives - a position statement from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes, Kidney Int, 72, 247, 10.1038/sj.ki.5002343 · DOI
  37. Ross, 2016, Cost-effectiveness of aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema treatment: analysis from the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network comparative effectiveness trial, JAMA Ophthalmol, 134, 888, 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1669 · DOI
  38. Al-Moujahed, 2021, Racial differences in anti-VEGF intravitreal injections among commercially insured beneficiaries, Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina, 52, 208, 10.3928/23258160-20210330-05 · DOI
  39. Mahr, 2018, Racial differences in age-related macular degeneration and associated anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injections among Medicare beneficiaries, Ophthalmol Retina, 2, 1188, 10.1016/j.oret.2018.05.005 · DOI
  40. Avery, 2016, Systemic safety of prolonged monthly anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis, JAMA Ophthalmol, 134, 21, 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4070 · DOI
  41. Virgili, 2017, Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta-analysis, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6, CD007419
  42. VanderBeek, 2023, Difficulty in assessing the systemic adverse effects of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, JAMA Ophthalmol, 141, 666, 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.2307 · DOI
  43. Weinstein, 2017, Channeling in the use of nonprescription paracetamol and ibuprofen in an electronic medical records database: evidence and implications, Drug Saf, 40, 1279, 10.1007/s40264-017-0581-7 · DOI
  44. Weinstein, 2020, Channeling bias in the analysis of risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, and acute renal failure with the use of paracetamol compared with ibuprofen, Drug Saf, 43, 927, 10.1007/s40264-020-00950-3 · DOI
  45. Schuemie, 2018, Empirical confidence interval calibration for population-level effect estimation studies in observational healthcare data, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 115, 2571, 10.1073/pnas.1708282114 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cai, C. X., Nishimura, A., Bowring, M. G., Westlund, E., Tran, D., Ng, J. H., Nagy, P., Cook, M., McLeggon, J.-A., DuVall, S. L., Matheny, M. E., Golozar, A., Ostropolets, A., Minty, E., Desai, P., Bu, F., Toy, B., Hribar, M., Falconer, T., Zhang, L., Lawrence-Archer, L., Boland, M. V., Goetz, K., Hall, N., Shoaibi, A., Reps, J., Sena, A. G., Blacketer, C., Swerdel, J., Jhaveri, K. D., Lee, E., Gilbert, Z., Zeger, S. L., Crews, D. C., Suchard, M. A., Hripcsak, G., & Ryan, P. B.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Hofstra University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Cambridge Intellectual Property (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Stanford Health Care (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Northwell Health (US)
Corresponding author
Cai, Cindy X.
Venue
Ophthalmology Retina
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
733-743
ISSN
2468-6530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394624476
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ophthalmology Retina (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NEI
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
renal failure, anti-VEGF therapy, ranibizumab, aflibercept, bevacizumab, intravitreal injection, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, age-related macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion, adverse drug reactions, drug safety, propensity score matching
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Aged, Blindness, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Macular Edema, Male, Middle Aged, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Retinal Vein Occlusion, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Incidence, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Renal Insufficiency, Intravitreal Injections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review