The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Team resilience
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Resilience means to effectively respond to adverse events before, during, and after adverse events.
“From this perspective, resilience means to effectively respond to adverse events, not only after adverse events, but before, during, and after as well (e.g., Linnenluecke et al. 2012;Alliger et al. 2015;Williams et al. 2017).”
From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Alliger et al. 2015
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Alliger, G. M., Cerasoli, C. P., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Vessey, W. B.
- Venue
- Organizational Dynamics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 176-184
- ISSN
- 0090-2616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2747857012
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 19.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Keywords
- team resilience, team performance, organizational resilience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
