Managing worklife boundaries in the digital age
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Without the customary division between home and work life, some individuals struggled to separate professional and personal identities and commitments, which negatively impacted on their well-being.
“Without the customary division between home and work life, some individuals struggled to separate professional and personal identities and commitments, which negatively impacted on their well‐being (Kossek, 2016; Wepfer et al., 2018).”
From Living through lockdown: A qualitative exploration of individuals' experiences in the UK. (2022) · cites this paper as Kossek, 2016
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 4 · Cited by 247
- Authors
- Kossek, E. E.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kossek, Ellen Ernst
- ORCID
- Kossek, Ellen Ernst
- Venue
- Organizational Dynamics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 258-270
- ISSN
- 0090-2616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2525919961
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 31.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Organizational Dynamics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
- Keywords
- work-life boundaries, work-life balance, digital technologies, remote work, digital divide, boundary management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review