Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 608

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revised genetic diagrams for natural gases based on a global dataset of >20,000 samples

Milkov, Alexei V., Etiope, Giuseppe·2018·Organic Geochemistry

Abstract

Abstract The origin of natural gases, in particular those containing methane (CH4 or C1), ethane (C2H6 or C2), propane (C3H8 or C3) and carbon dioxide (CO2), is commonly interpreted using binary genetic diagrams of δ13C-C1 versus C1/(C2 + C3), δ13C-C1 versus δ2H-C1 and δ13C-C1 versus δ13C-CO2. These diagrams are empirical, but their currently used genetic fields were proposed around 30–40 years ago based on geographically and geologically limited datasets of tens to few hundreds gas samples. As a result, many recently collected gas samples plot outside of accepted genetic fields making these genetic diagrams partly inadequate for the purpose of gas interpretation. Here, we update the genetic diagrams using geochemical and geological data on 20,621 gas samples from a variety of geographical areas (76 countries and territories on six continents) and geological habitats (conventional and unconventional petroleum reservoirs, petroleum seeps and mud volcanoes, gas hydrates, volcanic/geothermal/hydrothermal manifestations, seeps and groundwater in serpentinized ultramafic rocks, aquifers, freshwater and marine sediments, igneous and metamorphic rocks). The revision includes genetic fields for primary microbial gases from CO2 reduction and methyl-type fermentation, secondary microbial gases generated during petroleum biodegradation, thermogenic and abiotic gases. The genetic field of thermogenic gases now includes early mature (δ13C-C1 as low as −75‰) and very late mature (δ13C-C1 around −15‰) gases recently recognized in various petroleum systems. Abiotic C1 is not necessarily 13C-enriched (δ13C > −20‰) as was often considered in the past. The δ13C values of abiotic C1 can be as negative as around −50‰, although a minor component of biotic (microbial or thermogenic) C1 is often associated with abiotic gas. In addition, the diagrams display molecular and isotopic changes that accompany post-generation processes of mixing, migration, biodegradation, thermochemical sulphate reduction and oxidation. The proposed diagrams cover the vast majority of hydrocarbon-containing gases currently known to exist in nature, are the most comprehensive empirical gas genetic diagrams published to date, and thus represent an essential tool for interpretations of natural gases. Still, holistic integration of geochemical and geological data is necessary to better interpret the origin of natural gases and processes that affected their composition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.09.002

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 608

Metadata

Authors
Milkov, A. V., & Etiope, G.
Venue
Organic Geochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
125
Pages
109-120
ISSN
0146-6380 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889636964
Cited by
608
References
45
FWCI
29.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised genetic diagrams for natural gases based on a global dataset of >20,000 samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.09.002
The paper
Milkov, A. V., & Etiope, G. (2018). Revised genetic diagrams for natural gases based on a global dataset of >20,000 samples. Organic Geochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.09.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.