Physiologic Model of Oropharyngeal Swallowing Revisited
Abstract
Objective: The purposes of this investigation were to determine whether the temporal onsets of swallow events segment into oral and pharyngeal phases, to test the interdependence of temporal onsets of swallow events, and to determine the influence of age on total swallow duration. Study Design and Setting: The onsets of swallowing and respiratory measures were studied in 76 healthy normal individuals. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a 2‐factor solution but did not support the hypothesized 2‐phase structure (ie, oral and pharyngeal). Two of the onsets, apnea onset and apnea offset, formed a single factor that explained 12.6% of the variation among the 11 onset times. The other 9 onsets formed a second factor that explained 66.4% of the variation. Age accounted for modest variation in total swallow duration. Conclusions: The two factors, oropharyngeal and respiratory, explained 79% of the variation among the 11 onset times. Significance: This finding speaks to the overlap between the initiation of oral and pharyngeal components of swallowing in adults and highlights the artificiality of separating the swallowing continuum into isolated phases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous exploratory factor analysis of temporal components of swallowing yielded only one 'oropharyngeal' factor due to interdependency of structural movement onsets.
“It has been demonstrated that when the onsets of temporal components of swallowing are subjected to exploratory factor analysis, only one factor (“oropharyngeal”) resulted because of the interdependency of the onset of one structural movement with another [65].”
From MBS Measurement Tool for Swallow Impairment—MBSImp: Establishing a Standard (2008) · cites this paper as [65]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 80
- Authors
- Martin‐Harris, B., Michel, Y., & Castell, D. O.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Martin‐Harris, Bonnie
- Venue
- Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 234-240
- ISSN
- 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
- 0194-5998
- 1097-6817
- OpenAlex
- W1970808188
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 16.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R03DC004864, K23DC005764, 1 K23 DC 5764, R03 DC-04864)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Keywords
- oropharyngeal swallowing, swallowing phases, respiratory events
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Deglutition, Female, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oropharynx, Probability, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review