CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66Advanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesAir Traffic Management and OptimizationMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency

The carbon dioxide challenge facing aviation

Hileman, James I., De la Rosa Blanco, Elena, Bonnefoy, Philippe A., Carter, Nicholas A.·2013·Progress in Aerospace Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 66

Authors
Hileman, J. I., De la Rosa Blanco, E., Bonnefoy, P. A., & Carter, N. A.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Hileman, James I.
ORCID
Hileman, James I.
Venue
Progress in Aerospace Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
63
Pages
84-95
ISSN
0376-0421 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.07.003
OpenAlex
W2004335378
Cited by
66
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Progress in Aerospace Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Air Traffic Management and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Keywords
aviation greenhouse gas emissions, CO2 emissions, aircraft efficiency, operational efficiency, alternative aviation fuels, aircraft design, climate change mitigation, narrow-body aircraft

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review