The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“I hit the Shift-key and then the computer crashed”: Children and false admissions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data on false confessions, including non-DNA exoneration studies and surveys of juveniles in the United States and Europe, show disproportionate numbers of young people and individuals with disabilities making such confessions.
“Data on false confessions, including in studies of non-DNA exonerations and large-scale surveys of juveniles in the United States and Europe, reveal disproportionate numbers of young people and individuals with disabilities make such confessions (see Drizin & Leo 2004; see also Candel et al. 2005, Gudjonsson et al. 2006, Redlich & Goodman 2003).”
From Wrongful Convictions (2020) · cites this paper as Candel et al. 2005
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Candel, 2000, Measuring interrogative suggestibility in children: Reliability and validity of the Bonn Test of Statement Suggestibility, Psychology, Crime & Law, 6, 61, 10.1080/10683160008410832 · DOI
- Endres, 1997, The suggestibility of the child witness: The role of individual differences and their assessment, The Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 1, 44
- Gudjonsson, 1984, A new scale of interrogative suggestibility, Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303, 10.1016/0191-8869(84)90069-2 · DOI
- Gudjonsson, 1986, Suggestibility in police interrogation: A social psychological model, Social Behaviour, 1, 83
- Gudjonsson, 2004, Confessions and denials and the relationship with personality, Legal Criminological Psychology, 9, 121, 10.1348/135532504322776898 · DOI
- Holmberg, 2002, Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experience of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 31, 10.1002/bsl.470 · DOI
- Horselenberg, 2003, Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Kiechel (1996), Psychology, Crime & Law, 9, 1, 10.1080/10683160308141 · DOI
- Kassin, 1997, The psychology of confession evidence, American Psychologist, 52, 221, 10.1037/0003-066X.52.3.221 · DOI
- Kassin, 1996, The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation, Psychological Science, 7, 125, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00344.x · DOI
- Pearse, 1998, Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: Predicting the likelihood of a confession, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8, 1, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199801/02)8:1<1::AID-CASP435>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
- Redlich, 2003, Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility, Law and Human Behavior, 27, 141, 10.1023/A:1022543012851 · DOI
- Sigurdsson, 1996, The psychological characteristics of ‘false confessors’. A study among Icelandic prison inmates and juvenile offenders, Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 321, 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00184-0 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Garrett, B. L. (2020) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024739 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Candel, I., Merckelbach, H., Loyen, S., & Reyskens, H.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Candel, Ingrid
- ORCID
- Merckelbach, Harald
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1381-1387
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993181282
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 16 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- false confessions, children, suggestibility, individual differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
