Cited by 128Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Why are they lonely? Perceived quality of early relationships with parents, attachment, personality predispositions and loneliness in first-year university students

Wiseman, Hadas, Mayseless, Ofra, Sharabany, Ruth·2006·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 128

Authors
Wiseman, H., Mayseless, O., & Sharabany, R.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Wiseman, Hadas
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
237-248
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021694437
Cited by
128
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
loneliness, parental bonding, attachment styles, ambivalent attachment, attachment avoidance, self-criticism, first-year students, parental care, mediation, personality vulnerability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review