The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: Separate constructs that are differentially related to specific fears
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Anxiety, sensitivity, anxiety frequency, and the prediction of fearfulness
Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(86)90143-9 · Cited by 3,169
Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7 · Cited by 1,632
Expectancy model of fear, anxiety, and panic
Reiss, S. (1991) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(91)90092-9 · Cited by 1,006
Fear of spiders’ questionnaire
Szymanski, J., & O'Donohue, W. (1995) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(94)00072-t · Cited by 450 · cited 1×
“Internal consistency is good (.92; Szymanski & O’Donohue, 1995).”
BackgroundA test of a disease-avoidance model of animal phobias
Matchett, G., & Davey, G. C. L. (1991) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(09)80011-9 · Cited by 387
Self-citationRozin, P., Haidt, J., McCauley, C., Dunlop, L., & Ashmore, M. (1999) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2251 · Cited by 341
Cited by
Misophonia: Phenomenology, comorbidity and demographics in a large sample
Jager, I., de Koning, P., Bost, T., Denys, D., & Vulink, N. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231390 · Cited by 271
Acceptance of Insect-Based Food Products in Western Societies: A Systematic Review
Kröger, T., Dupont, J., Büsing, L., & Fiebelkorn, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.759885 · Cited by 269
McKay, D., Yang, H., Elhai, J., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102233 · Cited by 152
“It was assumed that the DPSS-R, which was not previously published in Chinese and translated here to Chinese but not subject to additional tests of validity, retained the two-factor structure originally found in van Overveld et al. (2006).”
BackgroundMethodAgreeableness and Its Consequences: A Quantitative Review of Meta-Analytic Findings
Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683211073007 · Cited by 130
Pace-Schott, E. F., Verga, P. W., Bennett, T. S., & Spencer, R. M. C. (2012) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.04.015 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- van Overveld, W. J. M., de Jong, P. J., Peters, M. L., Cavanagh, K., & Davey, G. C. L.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1241-1252
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147765982
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: Separate constructs that are differentially related to specific fears. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.021
- The paper
- van Overveld, W. J. M., de Jong, P. J., Peters, M. L., Cavanagh, K., & Davey, G. C. L. (2006). Disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: Separate constructs that are differentially related to specific fears. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
