Cited by 153Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

A psychometric evaluation of the satisfaction with life scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students

Hultell, Daniel, Petter Gustavsson, J.·2008·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 153

Authors
Hultell, D., & Petter Gustavsson, J.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Hultell, Daniel
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
1070-1079
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050225683
Cited by
153
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
Satisfaction with Life Scale, life satisfaction, subjective well-being, psychometric properties, measurement invariance, sex differences, age differences, factor structure, university students, pre-service teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review