A policy-capturing study of the contextual antecedents of test anxiety
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only two papers measured age: Frisby and Osterlind (2006) and Reeve et al. (2008).
“However, only two papers (Frisby & Osterlind, 2006;Reeve et al., 2008) measured age.”
From Factors Related to Mean Score Group Differences on Cognitive Ability Tests: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Reeve et al., 2008
Women report being more anxious in high-stakes testing.
“women report being more anxious in highstakes testing (Reeve et al., 2008;Stenlund et al., 2017).”
From Factors Related to Mean Score Group Differences on Cognitive Ability Tests: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Reeve et al., 2008
Cites
Correlates, Causes, Effects, and Treatment of Test Anxiety
Hembree, R. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058001047 · Cited by 1,723 · see citing works
Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: reactions to tests
Sarason, I. G. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.929 · Cited by 959 · see citing works
Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures: An Updated Model and Meta‐Analysis
Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors Related to Mean Score Group Differences on Cognitive Ability Tests: A Systematic Review
Cuppello, S., Zibarras, L. D., & Corr, P. J. (2025) · Trends in Psychology · doi:10.1007/s43076-025-00504-5
- Authors
- Reeve, C. L., Bonaccio, S., & Charles, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Reeve, Charlie L.
- Venue
- Personality and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 243-248
- ISSN
- 0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002737844
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Keywords
- test anxiety, contextual antecedents, within-person variability, individual differences, test purposes, self-confidence, test familiarity, trait anxiety, gender differences, age differences, ability levels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
